Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer

被引:5
|
作者
Martin, Caitlin [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Jeani [1 ]
Boulet, Sheree [1 ]
Jamieson, Denise J. [1 ]
Kissin, Dmitry [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, 4770 Buford Highway NE,Mailstop F-74, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Glenn Bldg,4th Floor,69 Jesse Hill Jr Dr SE, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
Double embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; Double embryo implantation; Multiple birth pregnancy; Elective single embryo transfer; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MULTIPLE BIRTHS; LIVE BIRTH; UNITED-STATES; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; CYCLES; RISK; CRYOPRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-016-0770-9
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer (DET) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures and to evaluate the implications of findings in selecting candidates for elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Factors predicting double embryo implantation, defined as embryo transfers with two or more heartbeats on 6-week ultrasound following DET, were assessed using the US National ART Surveillance System data from 2000 to 2012 (n = 1,793,067 fresh, autologous transfers). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) were estimated after stratifying by prognosis. Favorable prognosis was defined as first-time ART with supernumerary embryo(s) cryopreserved. Average prognosis was defined as first-time ART without supernumerary embryo(s) cryopreserved, prior unsuccessful ART with supernumerary embryo(s) cryopreserved, or prior ART with previous birth(s) conceived with ART or naturally. Rates and factors associated with double embryo implantation were compared with single embryo implantation following DET among both prognosis groups. Double embryo implantation was positively associated with blastocyst (versus cleavage) transfer in favorable (aRR = 1.58 (1.51-1.65)) and average (aRR = 1.67 (1.60-1.75)) prognosis groups and negatively associated with age > 35 years in both prognosis groups. For average prognosis patients, double embryo implantation was associated with retrieving > 10 oocytes (aRR = 1.22 (1.18-1.24)). Regardless of prognosis, patients aged < 35 years with blastocyst-stage embryos and average prognosis patients from whom > 10 oocytes were retrieved may be good candidates for eSET. Physicians may consider using these data to counsel patients on eSET, which would reduce multiple gestations and associated complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1353
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer
    Caitlin Martin
    Jeani Chang
    Sheree Boulet
    Denise J. Jamieson
    Dmitry Kissin
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2016, 33 : 1343 - 1353
  • [2] Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction
    Moustafa, Mohamed Khaled
    Sheded, Sheded Ashour
    Mousta, Mohamed Abd El Aziz
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [3] Elective single and double embryo transfer
    Dhont, M
    [J]. IFFS 2001 SELECTED FREE COMMUNICATIONS, 2001, : 51 - 57
  • [4] ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (ESET) VERSUS DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (DET) FOLLOWING FAILED MANDATORY SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (MSET).
    Mancuso, A. C.
    Sparks, A. E.
    Duran, H. E.
    Van Voorhis, B. J.
    Kapfhamer, J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E192 - E192
  • [5] Elective single embryo transfer compared with elective double embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Donoso, P.
    Verpoest, W.
    Papanikolaou, E. G.
    Liebaers, I.
    Van Steirteghem, A.
    Devroey, P.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 : I42 - I43
  • [6] Elective single versus double embryo transfer
    Templeton, Allan
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341
  • [7] Is elective single embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative to double embryo transfer?
    Scotland, G. S.
    McNamee, P.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [8] Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization
    Thurin, A
    Hausken, J
    Hillensjö, T
    Jablonowska, B
    Pinborg, A
    Strandell, A
    Bergh, C
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (23): : 2392 - 2402
  • [9] Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology
    Martin, Angela S.
    Chang, Jeani
    Zhang, Yujia
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    McKane, Patricia
    Bernson, Dana
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (04) : 954 - 960
  • [10] Outcomes of elective cryopreserved single or double embryo transfers following failure to conceive after fresh single embryo transfer
    Araujo Monteleone, Pedro Augusto
    Mirisola, R. J.
    Goncalves, S. P.
    Baracat, Edmund C.
    Serafini, Paulo C.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2016, 33 (02) : 161 - 167