Bumps in river profiles: uncertainty assessment and smoothing using quantile regression techniques

被引:97
|
作者
Schwanghart, Wolfgang [1 ]
Scherler, Dirk [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
[2] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Earth Surface Geochem, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Geol Sci, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; DEM UNCERTAINTY; DRAINAGE BASINS; ERROR; SRTM; VALIDATION; TOPOGRAPHY; RESOLUTION; TERRAIN; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.5194/esurf-5-821-2017
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The analysis of longitudinal river profiles is an important tool for studying landscape evolution. However, characterizing river profiles based on digital elevation models (DEMs) suffers from errors and artifacts that particularly prevail along valley bottoms. The aim of this study is to characterize uncertainties that arise from the analysis of river profiles derived from different, near-globally available DEMs. We devised new algorithms quantile carving and the CRS algorithm - that rely on quantile regression to enable hydrological correction and the uncertainty quantification of river profiles. We find that globally available DEMs commonly overestimate river elevations in steep topography. The distributions of elevation errors become increasingly wider and right skewed if adjacent hillslope gradients are steep. Our analysis indicates that the AW3D DEM has the highest precision and lowest bias for the analysis of river profiles in mountainous topography. The new 12m resolution TanDEM-X DEM has a very low precision, most likely due to the combined effect of steep valley walls and the presence of water surfaces in valley bottoms. Compared to the conventional approaches of carving and filling, we find that our new approach is able to reduce the elevation bias and errors in longitudinal river profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 839
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating Wind Power Uncertainty using Quantile Smoothing Splines Regression
    Mararakanye, Ndamulelo
    Bekker, Bernard
    [J]. 2022 57TH INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC 2022): BIG DATA AND SMART GRIDS, 2022,
  • [2] Predictive uncertainty assessment in flood forecasting using quantile regression
    Amina, M. K.
    Chithra, N. R.
    [J]. H2OPEN JOURNAL, 2023, 6 (03) : 477 - 492
  • [3] Estimation of the uncertainty in water level forecasts at ungauged river locations using quantile regression
    Roscoe, Kathryn L.
    Weerts, Albrecht H.
    Schroevers, Marinus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2012, 10 (04) : 383 - 394
  • [4] Upper and lower approximation models in interval regression using regression quantile techniques
    Lee, H
    Tanaka, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 116 (03) : 653 - 666
  • [5] Growth velocity assessment in paediatric AIDS: smoothing, penalized quantile regression and the definition of growth failure
    Carey, VJ
    Yong, FH
    Frenkel, LM
    McKinney, RM
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (03) : 509 - 526
  • [6] Quantifying uncertainty in coastal salinity regime for biological application using quantile regression
    Yurek, Simeon
    Allen, Micheal
    Eaton, Mitchell J.
    Chagaris, David
    Reaver, Nathan
    Martin, Julien
    Frederick, Peter
    Dehaven, Mark
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (04):
  • [7] Using quantile regression forest to estimate uncertainty of digital soil mapping products
    Vaysse, Kevin
    Lagacherie, Philippe
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2017, 291 : 55 - 64
  • [8] PET Denoising and Uncertainty Estimation Based on NVAE Model Using Quantile Regression Loss
    Cui, Jianan
    Xie, Yutong
    Joshi, Anand A.
    Gong, Kuang
    Kim, Kyungsang
    Son, Young-Don
    Kim, Jong-Hoon
    Leahy, Richard
    Liu, Huafeng
    Li, Quanzheng
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION, MICCAI 2022, PT IV, 2022, 13434 : 173 - 183
  • [9] Constructing Interval Forecasts for Solar and Wind Energy Using Quantile Regression, ARCH and Exponential Smoothing Methods
    Boland, John
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (13)
  • [10] Alternative configurations of quantile regression for estimating predictive uncertainty in water level forecasts for the upper Severn River: a comparison
    Lopez, P. Lopez
    Verkade, J. S.
    Weerts, A. H.
    Solomatine, D. P.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (09) : 3411 - 3428