The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: An update of a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:574
|
作者
Chapple, Christopher R. [2 ]
Khullar, Vik [1 ]
Gabriel, Zahava
Muston, Dominic
Bitoun, Caty Ebel
Weinstein, David
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, St Marys Hosp, London, England
[2] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
antimuscarinic; overactive bladder; detrusor overactivity; incontinence; meta-analysis; systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Antimuscarinic agents are currently the first-line pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder. Objectives: A systematic review published in 2005 was updated, including data on a newly licensed antimuscarinic (fesoterodine). The primary aim of this study was to systematically review evidence on the efficacy of licensed administration of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder from randomised controlled trials. Secondary aims were to review evidence on tolerability and safety and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Evidence acquisition. All relevant data sources from randomised controlled trials were searched, and two independent reviewers considered publications for inclusion and extracted relevant data. Meta-analysis was used to pool efficacy, tolerability, safety, and HRQL outcomes by treatment. Efficacy was measured by continent days, mean voided volume, urgency episodes, and micturition frequency. Tolerability and safety were measured by means of adverse event and withdrawal rates. HRQL was measured by various instruments. Evidence synthesis: An additional 1118 references were retrieved with data on 83 studies extracted. Antimuscarinics were found to be more effective than placebo. Tolerability was good; few of the antimuscarinics were found to have significantly higher withdrawal rates in comparison to placebo. No serious adverse event for any product was statistically significant compared to placebo. Dry mouth (mild, moderate, severe) was the most commonly reported adverse event (29.6% on treatment vs 7.9% on placebo), followed by pruritus (15.4% on treatment vs 5.2% on placebo). Improvements were seen in HRQL with treatment by darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin transdermal delivery system, propiverine extended release (ER), solifenacin, tolterodine ER and immediate release, and trospium. Limitations of the study include restrictions on the types of patients typically included in overactive bladder trials and topics that have not been adequately addressed in the current antimuscarinic literature. Conclusions: Antimuscarinics are efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated treatments that improve HRQL. Profiles of each drug and dosage differ and should be considered in making treatment choices. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 562
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chapple, C
    Khullar, V
    Gabriel, Z
    Dooley, JA
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (01) : 5 - 26
  • [2] The Effects of Antimuscarinic Treatments in Overactive Bladder: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Editorial Comment
    Chapple, C. R.
    Khullar, V.
    Gabriel, Z.
    Muston, D.
    Bitoun, C. E.
    Weinstein, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (06): : 2649 - 2650
  • [3] The safety and tolerability of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: Results from an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chapple, C.
    Khullar, V
    Gabriel, Z.
    Muston, D.
    Bitoun, Ebel C.
    Weinstein, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 : S49 - S50
  • [4] The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (vol 48, pg 5, 2005)
    Chapple, CR
    Khullar, V
    Gabriel, Z
    Dooley, JA
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (05) : 875 - 875
  • [5] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Antimuscarinic Drugs for Overactive Bladder
    Novara, Giacomo
    Galfano, Antonio
    Secco, Silvia
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Artibani, Walter
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) : 740 - 764
  • [6] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE COGNITIVE SAFETY OF ANTIMUSCARINIC TREATMENT FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER.
    Paquette, A.
    Tannenbaum, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 : 205 - 205
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of vibegron vs antimuscarinic monotherapy for overactive bladder
    Su, Shunye
    Hang, Liqin
    Lin, Jinlei
    Liu, Ludong
    Chen, Zhipeng
    Gao, Yuan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (05) : E23171
  • [8] Solifenacin for overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deyi Luo
    Liangren Liu
    Ping Han
    Qiang Wei
    Hong Shen
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 983 - 991
  • [9] Solifenacin for overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Deyi
    Liu, Liangren
    Han, Ping
    Wei, Qiang
    Shen, Hong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (08) : 983 - 991