Optimal Fat Suppression in Head and Neck MRI: Comparison of Multipoint Dixon with 2 Different Fat-Suppression Techniques, Spectral Presaturation and Inversion Recovery, and STIR

被引:31
|
作者
Gaddikeri, S. [1 ,2 ]
Mossa-Basha, M. [3 ]
Andre, J. B. [5 ]
Hippe, D. S. [4 ]
Anzai, Y. [6 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neuroradiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Utah, Hlth Ctr, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
WATER; SEPARATION; SEQUENCE; IMAGES; PROTON; LIVER;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A5483
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Uniform complete fat suppression is essential for identification and characterization of most head and pathology. Our aim was to compare the multipoint Dixon turbo spin-echo fat-suppression technique with 2 different fat-suppression techniques, including a hybrid spectral presaturation with inversion recovery technique and an inversion recovery STIR technique, in head and neck fat-suppression MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head and neck MR imaging datasets of 72 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of fat-suppression techniques used (group A: STIR and spectral presaturation with inversion recovery gadolinium-T1WI; group B: multipoint Dixon T2 TSE and multipoint Dixon gadolinium-T1WI TSE). Objective and subjective image quality and scan acquisition times were assessed and compared between multipoint Dixon T2 TSE versus STIR and multipoint Dixon gadolinium-T1WI TSE versus spectral presaturation with inversion recovery gadolinium-T1WI using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were enrolled in the study (group A, n = 33 and group B, n = 31). Signal intensity ratios were significantly higher for multipoint Dixon T2 and gadolinium-T1WI techniques compared with STIR (P < .001) and spectral presaturation with inversion recovery gadolinium-T1WI (P < .001), respectively. Two independent blinded readers revealed that multipoint Dixon T2 and gadolinium-T1WI techniques had significantly higher overall image quality (P =.022 and P < .001) and fat-suppression grades (P < .013 and P < .001 across 3 different regions) than STIR and spectral presaturation with inversion recovery gadolinium-T1WI, respectively. The scan acquisition time was relatively short for the multipoint Dixon technique (2 minutes versus 4 minutes 56 seconds for the T2-weighted sequence and 2 minutes versus 3 minutes for the gadolinium-T1WI sequence). CONCLUSIONS: The multipoint Dixon technique offers better image quality and uniform fat suppression at a shorter scan time compared with STIR and spectral presaturation with inversion recovery gadolinium-T1WI techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Fat suppression for coronary MR angiography at 3T: 2 point Dixon versus Spectral Presaturation with Inversion Recovery (SPIR)
    Markus Henningsson
    Peter Boernert
    Peter Koken
    Rene M Botnar
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [2] MRI of the wrist:: Comparison of high resolution pulse sequences and different fat-suppression techniques.
    Stäbler, A
    Spieker, A
    Bonel, H
    Schrank, C
    Glaser, C
    Petsch, R
    Putz, R
    Reiser, M
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (02): : 168 - 174
  • [3] Fat suppression in magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck region: is the two-point DIXON technique superior to spectral fat suppression?
    Wendl, Christina M.
    Eiglsperger, Johannes
    Dendl, Lena-Marie
    Brodoefel, Harald
    Schebesch, Karl-Michael
    Stroszczynski, Christian
    Fellner, Claudia
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1085):
  • [4] Comparison of the Artifacts Caused by Metallic Implants in Breast MRI Using Dual-Echo Dixon Versus Conventional Fat-Suppression Techniques
    Le, Yuan
    Kipfer, Hal D.
    Majidi, Shadie S.
    Holz, Stephanie
    Lin, Chen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (03) : W307 - W314
  • [5] Image quality and evaluation ability of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: Dixon fat-suppression technique vs. spectral attenuated inversion recovery
    Huang, Kai
    Lin, Xiaoxin
    Luo, Yaosheng
    Hu, Qiugen
    Guo, Baoliang
    Ouyang, Fusheng
    Ouyang, Yufeng
    Song, Cheng
    Chen, Haixiong
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [6] Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    Sharma, Puneet
    Hughes, Timothy
    Heberlein, Keith
    Tudorascu, Dana
    Martin, Diego R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [7] Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging
    Nakatsu, M
    Hatabu, H
    Itoh, H
    Morikawa, K
    Miki, Y
    Kasagi, K
    Shimono, T
    Shoji, K
    Shimada, Y
    Imamura, M
    Konishi, J
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 11 (01): : 56 - 60
  • [8] Regarding Fat Suppression in MRI, When Are Spectral Techniques Preferred Over STIR, and Vice Versa?
    Sensakovic, William F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (03) : W231 - W232
  • [9] Comparison of fat suppression capability for chest MR imaging with Dixon, SPAIR and STIR techniques at 3 Tesla MR system
    Kishida, Yuji
    Koyama, Hisanobu
    Seki, Shinichiro
    Yoshikawa, Takeshi
    Kyotani, Katsusuke
    Okuaki, Tomoyuki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 : 89 - 96
  • [10] Fat suppression techniques for breast MRI: Dixon versus spectral fat saturation for 3D T1-weighted at 3 T
    Kalovidouri, Anastasia
    Firmenich, Natacha
    Delattre, Benedicte M. A.
    Picarra, Marlise
    Becker, Christoph D.
    Montet, Xavier
    Botsikas, Diomidis
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2017, 122 (10): : 731 - 742