Relevance of Complaint Severity in Predicting the Progression of Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Machine Learning Approach

被引:13
|
作者
Xose Pereiro, Arturo [1 ]
Valladares-Rodriguez, Sonia [2 ]
Felpete, Alba [1 ]
Lojo-Seoane, Cristina [1 ]
Campos-Magdaleno, Maria [1 ]
Carme Mallo, Sabela [1 ]
Facal, David [1 ]
Anido-Rifon, Luis [2 ]
Belleville, Sylvie [3 ,4 ]
Juncos-Rabadan, Onesimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Dev Psychol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Vigo, Sch Telecommun Engn, Vigo, Spain
[3] Inst Univ Geriatrie Montreal, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Cognitive dysfunction; dementia; diagnosis; follow-up studies; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; MEMORY COMPLAINTS; OLDER-PEOPLE; ADULTS; DEMENTIA; CONVERSION; RISK; FRAMEWORK; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-210334
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) is a core criterion for diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline (SCD); however, no standard procedure for distinguishing normative and non-normative SCCs has yet been established. Objective: To determine whether differentiation of participants with SCD according to SCC severity improves the validity of the prediction of progression in SCD and MCI and to explore validity metrics for two extreme thresholds of the distribution in scores in a questionnaire on SCCs. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-three older adults with SCCs participating in the Compostela Aging Study (CompAS) were classified as MCI or SCD at baseline. The participants underwent two follow-up assessments and were classified as cognitively stable or worsened. Severity of SCCs (low and high) in SCD was established by using two different percentiles of the questionnaire score distribution as cut-off points. The validity of these cut-off points for predicting progression using socio-demographic, health, and neuropsychological variables was tested by machine learning (ML) analysis. Results: Severity of SCCs in SCD established considering the 5th percentile as a cut-off point proved to be the best metric for predicting progression. The variables with the main role in conforming the predictive algorithm were those related to memory, cognitive reserve, general health, and the stability of diagnosis over time. Conclusion: Moderate to high complainers showed an increased probability of progression in cognitive decline, suggesting the clinical relevance of standard procedures to determine SCC severity. Our findings highlight the important role of the multimodal ML approach in predicting progression.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1242
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting cognitive decline in Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Panteleimon Giannakopoulos
    [J]. Annals of General Psychiatry, 7 (Suppl 1)
  • [2] Predicting progression from subjective cognitive decline to mild cognitive impairment or dementia based on brain atrophy patterns
    Lerch, Ondrej
    Ferreira, Daniel
    Stomrud, Erik
    van Westen, Danielle
    Tideman, Pontus
    Palmqvist, Sebastian
    Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
    Hort, Jakub
    Hansson, Oskar
    Westman, Eric
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [3] Predicting Conversion from Subjective Cognitive Decline to Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Using Ensemble Machine Learning
    Dolcet-Negre, Marta M.
    Aguayo, Laura Imaz
    Garcia-De-Eulate, Reyes
    Marti-Andres, Gloria
    Fernandez-Matarrubia, Marta
    Dominguez, Pablo
    Fernandez-Seara, Maria A.
    Riverol, Mario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2023, 93 (01) : 125 - 140
  • [4] Study of the subjective complaint in people with mild cognitive impairment
    Bélanger, S
    Belleville, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2005, 17 : 244 - 245
  • [5] Progression from Subjective Cognitive Decline to Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: The Role of Baseline Cognitive Performance
    Jester, Dylan J.
    Vyhnalek, Martin
    Andel, Ross
    Markova, Hana
    Nikolai, Tomas
    Laczo, Jan
    Matuskova, Veronika
    Cechova, Katerina
    Sheardova, Katerina
    Hort, Jakub
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2022, 86 (04) : 1763 - 1774
  • [6] Biomarkers in subtypes of mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline
    Eliassen, Carl F.
    Reinvang, Ivar
    Selnes, Per
    Grambaite, Ramune
    Fladby, Tormod
    Hessen, Erik
    [J]. BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [7] Huntingtin intermediate alleles influence the progression from Subjective Cognitive Decline to Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Mazzeo, S.
    Emiliani, F.
    Bagnoli, S.
    Padiglioni, S.
    Conti, V.
    Ingannato, A.
    Giacomucci, G.
    Balestrini, J.
    Ferrari, C.
    Sorbi, S.
    Nacmias, B.
    Bessi, V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 69 - 70
  • [8] Risk of progression from subjective cognitive decline to mild cognitive impairment: The role of study setting
    Snitz, Beth E.
    Wang, Tianxiu
    Cloonan, Yona Keich
    Jacobsen, Erin
    Chang, Chung-Chou H.
    Hughes, Tiffany F.
    Kamboh, M. Ilyas
    Ganguli, Mary
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2018, 14 (06) : 734 - 742
  • [9] Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers and Clinical Progression in Patients with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Wolfsgruber, Steffen
    Polcher, Alexandra
    Koppara, Alexander
    Kleineidam, Luca
    Froelich, Lutz
    Peters, Oliver
    Huell, Michael
    Ruether, Eckart
    Wiltfang, Jens
    Maier, Wolfgang
    Kornhuber, Johannes
    Lewczuk, Piotr
    Jessen, Frank
    Wagner, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2017, 58 (03) : 939 - 950
  • [10] Predicting Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Petersen, Ronald C.
    Lundt, Emily S.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Weigand, Stephen D.
    Knopman, David S.
    Mielke, Michelle M.
    Roberts, Rosebud O.
    Lowe, Val J.
    Machulda, Mary M.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Geda, Yonas E.
    Jack, Clifford R., Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 85 (01) : 155 - 160