The safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis: A meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Yuan, Xiaowei [1 ]
Xu, Bangren [2 ]
Wong, Minglai [3 ]
Chen, Yang [3 ]
Tang, Yajun [3 ]
Deng, Liang [3 ]
Tang, Di [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou United Family Hosp, Dept Surg, 28 Fangyuan Rd, Guangzhou 510335, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hosp 7, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical timing; Safety and feasibility; Cost-effectiveness; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; ATLANTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2020.06.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It remains controversial on the optimal timing of cholecystectomy for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. This study aimed at comparing the safety, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC, within 72 h after admission) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC, beyond 72 h after admission) for patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. We only included articles from RCTs which designed to evaluate the complications, conversion to open cholecystectomy, recurrence of acute pancreatitis, the length of hospital stay, and costs between patients undergoing ELC and those undergoing DLC. We schemed to analyze data using STATA 15.0 with both the random-effects and the fixed-effect models. We computed relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Results: A total of 4 studies involving 439 (215 vs 224) patients were included. The difference of complication rate [3.3% vs 3.2%; RR 1.03 (0.35, 3.01), P = 0.961] and rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy [3.8% vs 3.3%; RR 1.13 (0.37, 3.43), P = 0.830] are insignificant between patients who underwent ELC and ones who underwent DLC. The difference of rate of recurrence of acute pancreatitis is significant between ELC and DLC (2.17% vs 8.99%; RR 0.24 (0.08-0.70), P = 0.009). ELC does not shorten the length of hospital stay (random-effects model analysis: WMD -1.09 days (-2.67, 0.48), P = 0.173; fixed-effect model analysis: WMD -0.62 days (-1.00, -0.24), P = 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to DLC, ELC is equally safe and feasible both in complication rate and rate of conversion to open procedure, and significantly reduces the recurrence rate of acute pancreatitis. (C) 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 296
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild acute gallstone pancreatitis
    Morris, S.
    Gurusamy, K. S.
    Patel, N.
    Davidson, B. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (07) : 828 - 835
  • [2] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild acute biliary pancreatitis
    Aguiló, J
    Asencio, F
    Viciano, V
    Sanchis, C
    Torro, J
    Martinez, A
    Medrano, J
    Ahmad, M
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, 8 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [3] Meta-analysis of the cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
    Gallagher, T. K.
    Kelly, M. E.
    Hoti, E.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [4] Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Du-Jiang
    Lu, Hui-Min
    Guo, Qiang
    Lu, Shan
    Zhang, Ling
    Hu, Wei-Ming
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 379 - 388
  • [5] Early or late Cholecystectomy in Patients with mild biliary acute Pancreatitis?
    Strobel, O.
    Buechler, M. W.
    CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (09): : 759 - 759
  • [6] TIMING OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH MILD ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
    Ilhan, Mehmet
    Soytas, Yigit
    Gok, Ali Fuat Kaan
    Bademler, Sulcyman
    Guloglu, Recep
    Ertekin, Cemalettin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2016, 19 (03): : 162 - 168
  • [7] Safety of early same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute mild biliary pancreatitis. A retrospective study for acute pancreatitis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Sicong
    Chen, Liang
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [8] The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis A meta-analysis
    Zhong, Fu-ping
    Wang, Kai
    Tan, Xue-qin
    Nie, Jian
    Huang, Wen-feng
    Wang, Xiao-fang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (40)
  • [9] The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (<48 hours) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    Randial Perez, Leonardo Jose
    Fernando Parra, Juan
    Aldana Dimas, Guillermo
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2014, 92 (02): : 107 - 113
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Observation in Older Patients Presenting with Mild Biliary Disease
    Parmar, Abhishek D.
    Coutin, Mark D.
    Vargas, Gabriela M.
    Tamirisa, Nina P.
    Sheffield, Kristin M.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (09) : 1616 - 1622