The Role of Fake Review Detection in Managing Online Corporate Reputation

被引:1
|
作者
Loke, R. E. [1 ]
Kisoen, Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Market Insights, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Online Reviews; Feature Extraction; Spam Detection; Supervised Machine Learning; Strong Corporate Reputation Management;
D O I
10.5220/0011144600003269
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In a recent official statement, Google highlighted the negative effects of fake reviews on review websites and specifically requested companies not to buy and users not to accept payments to provide fake reviews (Google, 2019). Also, governmental authorities started acting against organisations that show to have a high number of fake reviews on their apps (DigitalTrends, 2018; Gov UK, 2020; ACM, 2017). However, while the phenomenon of fake reviews is well-known in industries as online journalism and business and travel portals, it remains a difficult challenge in software engineering (Martens & Maalej, 2019). Fake reviews threaten the reputation of an organisation and lead to a disvalued source to determine the public opinion about brands. Negative fake reviews can lead to confusion for customers and a loss of sales. Positive fake reviews might also lead to wrong insights about real users' needs and requirements. Although fake reviews have been studied for a while now, there are only a limited number of spam detection models available for companies to protect their corporate reputation. Especially in times with the coronavirus, organisations need to put extra focus on online presence and limit the amount of negative input that affects their competitive position which can even lead to business loss. Given state-of-the-art derived features that can be engineered from review texts, a spam detector based on supervised machine learning is derived in an experiment that performs quite well on the well-known Amazon Mechanical Turk dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 256
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing corporate image and corporate reputation
    Gray, ER
    Balmer, JMT
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1998, 31 (05) : 695 - 702
  • [2] Managing an Online Reputation
    Zusman, Edie E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (04) : N11 - N14
  • [3] Managing Corporate Reputation and Risk
    Larsen, Dennis
    CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2005, 8 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [4] Financial resources and corporate reputation Toward common management principles for managing corporate reputation
    Siano, Alfonso
    Kitchen, Philip
    Confetto, Maria
    CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 15 (01) : 68 - +
  • [5] Fake Reviewer Group Detection in Online Review Systems
    Cao, Chen
    Li, Shihao
    Yu, Shuo
    Chen, Zhikui
    21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS ICDMW 2021, 2021, : 935 - 942
  • [6] Managing Corporate Reputation: A Perspective on the Spanish Market
    Maria Casado, Ana
    Ignacio Pelaez, Jose
    Cardona, Juan
    CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2014, 17 (01) : 46 - 63
  • [7] Managing internal stakeholders' views of corporate reputation
    Olmedo-Cifuentes, Isabel
    Maria Martinez-Leon, Inocencia
    Davies, Gary
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2014, 8 (01) : 83 - 111
  • [8] Beyond Corporate Reputation: Managing Reputational Interdependence
    Barnett, Michael
    Hoffman, Andrew
    CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2008, 11 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [9] Managing internal stakeholders’ views of corporate reputation
    Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes
    Inocencia María Martínez-León
    Gary Davies
    Service Business, 2014, 8 : 83 - 111
  • [10] Beyond Corporate Reputation: Managing Reputational Interdependence
    Michael L Barnett
    Andrew J Hoffman
    Corporate Reputation Review, 2008, 11 (1) : 1 - 9