Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials

被引:78
|
作者
Coley, Nicola [1 ]
Andrieu, Sandrine [1 ,2 ]
Jaros, Mark [3 ]
Weiner, Michael [4 ]
Cedarbaum, Jesse [3 ]
Vellas, Bruno [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse 3, INSERM, U558, F-31073 Toulouse, France
[2] CHU Toulouse, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Toulouse, France
[3] Elan Pharmaceut, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] CHU Toulouse, Alzheimer Ctr, Dept Geriatr Med, Toulouse, France
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; Clinical trials; Outcome measures; Responsiveness; ADAS-COG; DOUBLE-BLIND; SCALE; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; MULTICENTER; DONEPEZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.01.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinical measures continue to be used as primary endpoints for disease-modifying trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, two co-primary endpoints must be specified, which measure cognitive and functional impairments. Generally, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is one of the co-primary endpoints, but high variability in this measure results in large sample sizes. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to assess its suitability as a single primary endpoint as an alternative to the traditional co-primary approach. Methods: Internal consistency, structural and convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB were assessed in 667 very mild to moderate (global Clinical Dementia Rating, 0.5-2) AD patients from the REAL.FR (Reseau sur la Maladie d' Alzheimer Francais) study. Results: The CDR-SB showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and acceptable structural (separate "cognitive" and "functional" factors) and convergent validity. Variability in mean changes over time was low, leading to excellent internal responsiveness (effect size = 1.2; standardized response mean = 1.17 at 2 years) and smaller sample sizes as compared with the ADAS-Cog. External responsiveness was acceptable when compared with "clinically meaningful" changes on the Activities of Daily Living scale but only borderline acceptable when compared with the ADAS-Cog and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Levels of missing data and floor/ceiling effects were low. Conclusions: The CDR-SB measures cognitive and functional impairment simultaneously, and has excellent 2-year internal responsiveness. This makes it a promising candidate as a sole primary endpoint for AD trials, although more work is required to determine the clinical relevance of CDR-SB changes, and its usefulness as an endpoint at other disease stages. (C) 2011 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 610
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease
    Lansdall, Claire J.
    Teng, Edmond
    Chague, Jerome
    Palanganda, Rohan
    Delmar, Paul
    Smith, Janice
    Cummings, Jeffrey L.
    McDougall, Fiona
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2024, 20 (09) : 5889 - 5900
  • [2] Rationale for use of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes as a primary outcome measure for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials
    Cedarbaum, Jesse M.
    Jaros, Mark
    Hernandez, Chito
    Coley, Nicola
    Andrieu, Sandrine
    Grundman, Michael
    Vellas, Bruno
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2013, 9 (01) : S45 - S55
  • [3] Urinary incontinence in Alzheimer's disease is associated with Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Barthel Activities of Daily Living
    Na, Hae Ri
    Park, Moon Ho
    Cho, Sung Tae
    Lee, Byung Chul
    Park, Suyeol
    Kim, Khae Hawn
    Choi, Jong Bo
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 7 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [4] Characterization of exposure-Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes relationship in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease from the aducanumab Phase 3 trials
    Muralidharan, Kumar Kandadi
    Kowalski, Kenneth G. G.
    Tong, Xiao
    Haeberlein, Samantha Budd
    Rajagovindan, Rajasimhan
    Nestorov, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2023, 50 (01) : 45 - 62
  • [5] Disease progression model for Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
    Samtani, Mahesh N.
    Raghavan, Nandini
    Novak, Gerald
    Nandy, Partha
    Narayan, Vaibhav A.
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2014, 10 : 929 - 952
  • [6] Progression of Alzheimer's disease as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores
    Williams, Monique M.
    Storandt, Martha
    Roe, Catherine M.
    Morris, John C.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2013, 9 (01) : S39 - S44
  • [7] Characterization of exposure-Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes relationship in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease from the aducanumab Phase 3 trials (vol 50, pg 45, 2023)
    Muralidharan, Kumar Kandadi
    Kowalski, Kenneth G. G.
    Tong, Xiao
    Haeberlein, Samantha Budd
    Rajagovindan, Rajasimhan
    Nestoro, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2023, 50 (02) : 145 - 145
  • [8] Validation of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes in Parkinson's Disease
    Rick, J.
    Xie, S.
    Mamikonyan, E.
    Deck, B.
    Rudovsky, S.
    Chen-Plotkin, A.
    Dahodwala, N.
    Morley, J.
    Duda, J.
    Trojanowski, J.
    Weintraub, D.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2019, 34
  • [9] Characterization of exposure–Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes relationship in subjects with early Alzheimer’s disease from the aducanumab Phase 3 trials
    Kumar Kandadi Muralidharan
    Kenneth G. Kowalski
    Xiao Tong
    Samantha Budd Haeberlein
    Rajasimhan Rajagovindan
    Ivan Nestorov
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2023, 50 : 45 - 62
  • [10] Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes in Parkinson's Disease
    Gallagher, Julia
    Rick, Jacqueline
    Xie, Sharon X.
    Martinez-Martin, Pablo
    Mamikonyan, Eugenia
    Chen-Plotkin, Alice
    Dahodwala, Nabila
    Morley, James
    Duda, John E.
    Trojanowski, John Q.
    Siderowf, Andrew
    Weintraub, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2021, 11 (02) : 737 - 745