The protection effects of marine protected areas on exploited molluscs from an oceanic archipelago

被引:16
|
作者
Sousa, Ricardo [1 ,2 ]
Henriques, Paulo [3 ]
Vasconcelos, Joana [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Pinto, Ana Rita [2 ]
Delgado, Joao [2 ,7 ]
Riera, Rodrigo [4 ]
机构
[1] OOM ARDITI, Edificio Madeira Tecnopolo, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
[2] DSI DRP, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
[3] Univ Madeira, Fac Ciencias Vida, Campus Penteada, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
[4] Univ Catolica Santisima Concepcion, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ecol, Concepcion, Chile
[5] SRE, Edificio Governo Reg, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal
[6] Ctr Ciencias Mar & Ambiente MARE, Sitio Piedade, Canical, Madeira Island, Portugal
[7] Ctr Interdisciplinar Invest Marinha & Ambiental C, Porto, Portugal
关键词
conservation evaluation; harvesting; Atlantic Ocean; intertidal; invertebrates; PATELLA-CANDEI; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS; INTERTIDAL GRAZERS; POPULATION STATUS; REEF FISHES; LIMPET; RESERVES; SIZE; INVERTEBRATES;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.3285
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Limpets are one of the most successful intertidal algal grazers in the north-eastern Atlantic. They provide valuable ecosystem services, playing a pivotal role in maintaining rocky shore ecological balance and have an important economic value, being subject to high levels of exploitation in several oceanic archipelagos. Limpets represent one of the most profitable economic activities of small-scale fisheries in the Madeira archipelago. However, limpets are extremely vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts, such as overharvesting, habitat fragmentation, and pollution. The protection effects and the effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs) on the population dynamics of two historically highly exploited limpet species, Patella aspera and Patella candei, were analysed through a comparative study of size, reproduction, and biomass in the Madeira archipelago. The effects of protection from MPAs on limpet populations resulted in a differential increase on size at first maturity, shell size, and capture per unit effort according to the degree of protection. Old and enforced MPAs showed the best-preserved limpet populations in the study area, and both variables (age and enforcement) best explained the observed variability among the MPAs studied. A thorough and multidisciplinary study is necessary to obtain a reliable picture of commercial stocks of the two targeted species (P. aspera and P. candei). Genetic analysis and studies on the food source of limpets may shed light to develop integrative conservation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 729
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marine protected areas for spatially structured exploited stocks
    Tuck, GN
    Possingham, HP
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2000, 192 : 89 - 101
  • [2] Effects of small, Fijian community-based marine protected areas on exploited reef fishes
    Clements, Cody
    Bonito, Victor
    Grober-Dunsmore, Rikki
    Sobey, Milika
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2012, 449 : 233 - 243
  • [3] Beyond abundance and biomass: effects of marine protected areas on the demography of a highly exploited reef fish
    Taylor, Brett M.
    McIlwain, Jennifer L.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2010, 411 : 243 - 258
  • [4] Marine protected areas and pelagic fishing: The case of the Chagos Archipelago
    Sheppard, Charles
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2010, 60 (11) : 1899 - 1901
  • [5] Marine protected areas for demersal elasmobranchs in highly exploited Mediterranean ecosystems
    Gimenez, Joan
    Cardador, Laura
    Mazor, Tessa
    Kark, Salit
    Maria Bellido, Jose
    Coll, Marta
    Navarro, Joan
    [J]. MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 160
  • [6] Review of the effects of protection in marine protected areas: current knowledge and gaps
    Ojeda-Martinez, C.
    Bayle-Sempere, J. T.
    Sanchez-Jerez, P.
    Salas, F.
    Stobart, B.
    Goni, R.
    Falcon, J. M.
    Graziano, M.
    Guala, I.
    Higgins, R.
    Vandeperre, F.
    Le Direach, L.
    Martin-Sosa, P.
    Vaselli, S.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2011, 34 (01) : 191 - 203
  • [7] Classifying levels of protection in Marine Protected Areas
    Al-Abdulrazzak, Dalal
    Trombulak, Stephen C.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (03) : 576 - 582
  • [8] Spillover effects from temperate marine protected areas
    Murawski, S
    Rago, P
    Fogarty, M
    [J]. AQUATIC PROTECTED AREAS AS FISHERIES MANAGEMENT TOOLS, 2004, 42 : 167 - 184
  • [9] Fecundity strategy of the highly exploited limpet Patella ordinaria from an oceanic archipelago
    Vasconcelos, J.
    Ferro, J.
    Sousa, R.
    Pinto, A. R.
    Riera, R.
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 60
  • [10] Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the 'Protection Paradox'
    Bates, Amanda E.
    Cooke, Robert S. C.
    Duncan, Murray I.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Bruno, John F.
    Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro
    Cote, Isabelle M.
    Lefcheck, Jonathan S.
    Costello, Mark John
    Barrett, Neville
    Bird, Tomas J.
    Fenberg, Phillip B.
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 236 : 305 - 314