The Prolonged Analgesic Efficacy of an Ultrasound-Guided Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:33
|
作者
Zhang, Yanzi [1 ]
Tan, Zhen [2 ]
Liao, Ren [1 ]
Zhou, Zongke [2 ]
Kang, Pengde [2 ]
Cheng, Xu [1 ]
Huang, Kun [1 ]
Yang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Bin [2 ]
Pei, Fuxing [2 ]
Wang, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
PERIPHERAL-NERVE BLOCKS; SAPHENOUS-NERVE; ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PAIN; AMBULATION; FALLS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20180621-05
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the authors compared the analgesic efficacy of the single-shot adductor canal block (SS-ACB) vs the continuous adductor canal block (C-ACB) with intermittent boluses during the 72-hour postoperative period. Seventy-five patients randomly received the following: a single shot of 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively followed by intermittent saline boluses at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (SS-ACB group); 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine preoperatively and 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively (C-ACB group); or saline preoperatively and postoperatively (control group). The primary outcome was visual analog scale pain scores with movement on postoperative day 1. The dynamic pain scores of the 2 ACB groups were equivalent and were lower than those of the control group on postoperative day 1. Compared with the control group, the 2 ACB groups were less likely to use opioids on the operative day and the first 2 postoperative days. The patients in the control group and the C-ACB group exhibited less quadriceps muscle strength than those in the SS-ACB group on postoperative day 1. The time required for an SS-ACB was markedly shorter than that required for an indwelling adductor canal catheter. Further, each adductor canal catheter cost $80. Patients who received a single block reported more satisfaction with their pain-relief treatment. Given the similar analgesic effect but better quadriceps muscle strength, easier execution, and higher patient satisfaction, the SS-ACB may be more suitable for total knee arthroplasty patients than the C-ACB.
引用
收藏
页码:E607 / E614
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LONG-TERM ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED SINGLE-SHOT ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    Zhang, Y.
    Yang, J.
    Wang, X.
    Liao, R.
    Liu, J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 656 - 656
  • [2] The analgesic efficacy of the continuous adductor canal block compared to continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion with a single-shot adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Min Kyoung
    Moon, Hyoung Yong
    Ryu, Choon Gun
    Kang, Hyun
    Lee, Han Jun
    Shin, Hwa Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 32 (01): : 30 - 38
  • [3] A Comparative Study of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Block in Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty for Limb Mobilization and Analgesic Efficacy
    Siddiqui, Raziullah
    Bansal, Sumit
    Puri, Arun
    Sinha, Manoj
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [4] Analgesic efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block versus adductor canal block combined with intra-articular ropivacaine infusion after Iota knee arthroplasty
    Hippalgaonkar, K.
    Chandak, V
    Daultani, D.
    Mulpur, P.
    Eachempati, K. K.
    Reddy, A. V. G.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2021, 2 (12): : 1082 - 1088
  • [5] A Comparison of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block vs Femoral Nerve Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ludwigson, Jordan L.
    Tillmans, Samuel D.
    Galgon, Richard E.
    Chambers, Tamara A.
    Heiner, John P.
    Schroeder, Kristopher M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (03): : 741 - 741
  • [6] Analgesic efficacy of single- shot adductor canal block with levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial
    AbdelRady, Marwa Mahmoud
    Ali, Wesam Nashat
    Younes, Khaled Tolba
    Talaat, Esraa Ahmed
    AboElfadl, Ghada Mohammad
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 37 (01): : 386 - 393
  • [7] Intra-Articular Adductor Canal Block Has Equivalent Analgesic Effect to Traditional Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Huang, Deyong
    Zhang, Dazhi
    Jiang, Yi
    Yi, Jun
    Sun, Ke
    Shao, Hongyi
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2025,
  • [8] Continuous Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Hanson, Neil A.
    Allen, Cindy Jo
    Hostetter, Lucy S.
    Nagy, Ryan
    Derby, Ryan E.
    Slee, April E.
    Arslan, Alex
    Auyong, David B.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (06): : 1370 - 1377
  • [9] Minimum effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided adductor canal plus IPACK block in total knee arthroplasty
    Wang, Qiuru
    Hu, Jian
    Cai, Lijun
    Bahete, Aergen
    Yang, Jing
    Kang, Pengde
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 30 (02)
  • [10] Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Hussain, Nasir
    Brull, Richard
    Zhou, Steven
    Schroell, Robert
    McCartney, Colin
    Sawyer, Tamara
    Abdallah, Faraj
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (02) : 49 - 60