COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SSIM INDEX AND THE PEARSON COEFFICIENT AS A CRITERION FOR IMAGE SIMILARITY

被引:27
|
作者
Starovoitov, V. V. [1 ]
Eldarova, E. E. [2 ]
Iskakov, K. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Acad Sci Belarus, State Sci Inst, United Inst Informat Problems, Minsk, BELARUS
[2] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan
来源
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Image similarity; Image quality; SSIM index; MOS; Metric; Pearson correlation; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.32523/2306-6172-2020-8-1-76-90
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper,the SSIM index, which is the most popular measure of the structural image is studied. A mathematical proof that the SSIM index and its linear transformations are not metric functions is given. We demonstrated that this index, as well as any full-reference image comparison function, cannot evaluate the image quality. These functions estimate only some similarity degree between a reference image and its distorted copy. It is proved experimentally that the SSIM index does not always correctly determine similarity of images of the same scene. The Pearson linear correlation is a better tool for similarity analysis and it is faster to calculate. It is experimentally demonstrated that the Pearson correlation better than the SSIM index coincides with the subjective MOS image estimates. It is shown that the Pearson correlation coefficient is non-linearly related to the Euclid metric, but no any linear transformation of the coefficient can be a metric function. Our study proves that the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the SSIM index when evaluating image similarity.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 90
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPROVEMENT OF PEARSON SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT BASED ON ITEM FREQUENCY
    Zhang, Fie
    Zhou, Weitao
    Sun, Lili
    Lin, Xiaochuan
    Liu, Hongjie
    He, Zhimin
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WAVELET ANALYSIS AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICWAPR), 2017, : 248 - 253
  • [2] KERNEL IMAGE SIMILARITY CRITERION
    Talens, Vicent
    Moreno, Jose
    Camps-Valls, Gustavo
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 527 - 530
  • [3] Similarity criterion for image resizing
    Shungang Hua
    Xiaoxiao Li
    Qing Zhong
    EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2011
  • [4] Similarity criterion for image resizing
    Hua, Shungang
    Li, Xiaoxiao
    Zhong, Qing
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011,
  • [5] Clothing Similarity Estimation Using Dominant Color Descriptor and SSIM Index
    Czapiewski, Piotr
    Forczmanski, Pawel
    Okarma, Krzysztof
    Frejlichowski, Dariusz
    Hofman, Radoslaw
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER RECOGNITION SYSTEMS, CORES 2015, 2016, 403 : 491 - 500
  • [6] A note on Pearson Correlation Coefficient as a metric of similarity in recommender system
    Sheugh, Leily
    Alizadeh, Sasan H.
    2015 AI & ROBOTICS (IRANOPEN), 2015,
  • [7] WHY PEARSON R IS NOT A GOOD SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT FOR COMPARING COLLECTIONS
    COWGILL, GL
    AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 1990, 55 (03) : 512 - 521
  • [8] Structural similarity index (SSIM) revisited: A data-driven approach
    Bakurov, Illya
    Buzzelli, Marco
    Schettini, Raimondo
    Castelli, Mauro
    Vanneschi, Leonardo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 189
  • [9] Rate bounds on SSIM index of quantized image DCT coefficients
    Channappayya, Sumohana S.
    Bovik, Alan C.
    Heath, Robert W., Jr.
    Caramanis, Constantine
    DCC: 2008 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 352 - 361
  • [10] Prospects of Structural Similarity Index for Medical Image Analysis
    Mudeng, Vicky
    Kim, Minseok
    Choe, Se-woon
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (08):