Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal

被引:6
|
作者
Adam, Asrul [1 ]
Ibrahim, Zuwairie [2 ]
Mokhtar, Norrima [1 ]
Shapiai, Mohd Ibrahim [3 ]
Cumming, Paul [4 ,5 ]
Mubin, Marizan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Elect Engn, ACR Lab, Fac Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fac Elect & Elect Engn, Pekan 26600, Pahang, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Japan Int Inst Technol, Jalan Semarak, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counseling, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
SPRINGERPLUS | 2016年 / 5卷
关键词
Extreme learning machines (ELM); Electroencephalogram (EEG); Peak detection algorithm; Peak model; Pattern recognition; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; SPIKE DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; REGRESSION; MULTISTAGE; PATTERNS; HYBRID; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37-52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PEAK MODELS OF EYE BLINK EEG FOR SIGNAL PEAK DETECTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
    Adam, A.
    Ibrahim, Z.
    Mokhtar, N.
    Shapiai, M. I.
    Mubin, M.
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2016, 26 (01) : 67 - 89
  • [2] An Extreme Learning Machine-based Pedestrian Detection Method
    Yang, Kai
    Du, Eliza Y.
    Delp, Edward J.
    Jiang, Pingge
    Jiang, Feng
    Chen, Yaobin
    Sherony, Rini
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2013, : 1404 - 1409
  • [3] Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Models for Photoplethysmogram Signal Artifact Detection
    Athaya, Tasbiraha
    Choi, Sunwoong
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT CONVERGENCE: DATA, NETWORK, AND AI IN THE AGE OF UNTACT (ICTC 2020), 2020, : 1206 - 1208
  • [4] An Extreme Learning Machine-Based Community Detection Algorithm in Complex Networks
    Wang, Feifan
    Zhang, Baihai
    Chai, Senchun
    Xia, Yuanqing
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2018,
  • [5] Extreme Learning Machine-Based Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation for Classification of Hyperspectral Images
    Zhou, Li
    Ma, Li
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2019, 16 (11) : 1781 - 1785
  • [6] Peak Detection Method Evaluation for Ion Mobility Spectrometry by Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Hauschild, Anne-Christin
    Kopczynski, Dominik
    D'Addario, Marianna
    Baumbach, Joerg Ingo
    Rahmann, Sven
    Baumbach, Jan
    [J]. METABOLITES, 2013, 3 (02): : 277 - 293
  • [7] Robust Visual Knowledge Transfer via Extreme Learning Machine-Based Domain Adaptation
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhang, David
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2016, 25 (10) : 4959 - 4973
  • [8] BotDetector: An extreme learning machine-based Internet of Things botnet detection model
    Dong, Xudong
    Dong, Chen
    Chen, Zhenyi
    Cheng, Ye
    Chen, Bo
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 32 (05)
  • [9] Evaluation of four machine learning models for signal detection
    Dauner, Dan
    Leal, Eleazar
    Adam, Terrence
    Zhang, Rui
    Farley, Joel F.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 : 631 - 631
  • [10] Evaluation of four machine learning models for signal detection
    Dauner, Daniel G.
    Leal, Eleazar
    Adam, Terrence J.
    Zhang, Rui
    Farley, Joel F.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 14