Spatial Evaluation and Assimilation of SMAP, SMOS, and ASCAT Satellite Soil Moisture Products Over Africa Using Statistical Techniques

被引:26
|
作者
Mousa, B. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shu, Hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geospatial Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Engn, Cairo, Egypt
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
soil moisture; data assimilation; Triple Collocation (TC); SMAP; ASCAT; SMOS; IN-SITU; ERROR CHARACTERIZATION; VALIDATION; PERFORMANCE; RETRIEVALS; RADIOMETRY; NETWORK; MODEL; MODIS;
D O I
10.1029/2019EA000841
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The limited number of in situ stations of surface soil moisture (SM) in Africa creates a shortage in the validation of SM satellite products. Therefore, this study investigates the performance of Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), and the H113 product from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) on the regional scale over Africa through these goals: (1) validate of satellite SM products against in situ stations and SM data from the ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis product, (2) study the spatiotemporal variability of satellite SM products on the regional scale, and (3) evaluate the regional scale error patterns and investigate regions where the assimilation of satellites SM data may add improvement to ERA-Interim. Standard statistical metrics, hovmoller diagrams, and the Triple Collocation (TC) model were used to achieve these goals. Land cover data, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and precipitation data were used to interpret results. The validation results based on statistical metrics and TC indicate that over the desert and shrub, passive products showed better performance than ASCAT, while over moderate vegetation areas (grassland), SMAP had the best among SM products. Over high densely vegetated regions, ASCAT showed a high comparatively performance than passive products. The potential regions for assimilation of satellite data sets were selected to be over savannas and grassland regions for ASCAT, and over shrub and grassland regions for SMAP. In particular, SMAP and ASCAT SM data sets are considered more stable than SMOS for data assimilation and capturing the spatial distribution of SM on the regional scale over Africa.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global-scale evaluation of SMAP, SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture products using triple collocation
    Chen, Fan
    Crow, Wade T.
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Colliander, Andreas
    Burgin, Mariko S.
    Asanuma, Jun
    Aida, Kentaro
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 214 : 1 - 13
  • [2] Evaluation of SMOS, SMAP, ASCAT and Sentinel-1 Soil Moisture Products at Sites in Southwestern France
    El Hajj, Mohammad
    Baghdadi, Nicolas
    Zribi, Mehrez
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Nemesio
    Wigneron, Jean Pierre
    Al-Yaari, Amen
    Al Bitar, Ahmad
    Albergel, Clement
    Calvet, Jean-Christophe
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [3] ASCAT and SMOS soil moisture retrievals: A Comparison over Europe and Northern Africa
    Fascetti, F.
    Pierdicca, N.
    Pulvirenti, L.
    Crapolicchio, R.
    [J]. 2014 13TH SPECIALIST MEETING ON MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MICRORAD), 2014, : 10 - 13
  • [4] Evaluation of SMOS soil moisture with other existing satellite products
    De Jeu, Richard
    Holmes, Thomas
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Dorigo, Wouter
    Hahn, Sebastian
    Parinussa, Robert
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING AND HYDROLOGY, 2012, 352 : 25 - +
  • [5] Assessment of SMAP and SMOS soil moisture products using triple collocation method over Inner Mongolia
    Hu, Fengmin
    Wei, Zushuai
    Yang, Xining
    Xie, Wenjun
    Li, Yuanxi
    Cui, Changlu
    Yang, Beibei
    Tao, Chongxin
    Zhang, Wen
    Meng, Lingkui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 40
  • [6] An Evaluation of the EnKF vs. EnOI and the Assimilation of SMAP, SMOS and ESA CCI Soil Moisture Data over the Contiguous US
    Blyverket, Jostein
    Hamer, Paul D.
    Bertino, Laurent
    Albergel, Clement
    Fairbairn, David
    Lahoz, William A.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [7] EVALUATION OF SMAP LEVEL 2 SOIL MOISTURE ALGORITHMS USING SMOS DATA
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    Zhao, Tianjie
    Cosh, Michael
    Chan, Steven
    O'Neill, Peggy
    Njoku, Eni
    Colliander, Andreas
    Kerr, Yann
    Shi, J. C.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 2444 - 2447
  • [8] Comparison Between SMOS, VUA, ASCAT, and ECMWF Soil Moisture Products Over Four Watersheds in US
    Leroux, Delphine J.
    Kerr, Yann H.
    Al Bitar, Ahmad
    Bindlish, Rajat
    Jackson, Thomas J.
    Berthelot, Beatrice
    Portet, Gautier
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (03): : 1562 - 1571
  • [9] An assessment of SMOS version 6.20 products through Triple and Quadruple Collocation techniques considering ASCAT, ERA/Interim LAND, ISMN and SMAP soil moisture data
    Fascetti, F.
    Pierdicca, N.
    Crapolicchio, R.
    Pulvirenti, L.
    Muoz-Sabater, J.
    [J]. 2016 14TH SPECIALIST MEETING ON MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MICRORAD), 2016, : 91 - 94
  • [10] Evaluation of SMOS, SMAP, AMSR2 and FY-3C soil moisture products over China
    Fan, Jiazhi
    Luo, Man
    Han, Qinzhe
    Liu, Fulai
    Huang, Wanhua
    Tan, Shiqi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):