Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar

被引:161
|
作者
Harrison, Steven M. [1 ,2 ]
Dolinsky, Jill S. [3 ]
Johnson, Amy E. Knight [4 ]
Pesaran, Tina [3 ]
Azzariti, Danielle R. [1 ]
Bale, Sherri [5 ]
Chao, Elizabeth C. [3 ,6 ]
Das, Soma [4 ]
Vincent, Lisa [5 ]
Rehm, Heidi L. [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Partners HealthCare Personalized Med, Mol Med Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Ambry Genet, Aliso Viejo, CA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Human Genet, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] GeneDx, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Pediat, Div Genet & Genom, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
ACMG-AMP guidelines; ClinVar; data sharing; variant interpretation; CLASSIFICATION; CANCER; GENETICS; GENES; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2017.14
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Data sharing through ClinVar offers a unique opportunity to identify interpretation differences between laboratories. As part of a ClinGen initiative, four clinical laboratories (Ambry, GeneDx, Partners Healthcare Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, and University of Chicago Genetic Services Laboratory) collaborated to identify the basis of interpretation differences and to investigate if data sharing and reassessment resolve interpretation differences by analyzing a subset of variants. Methods: ClinVar variants with submissions from at least two of the four participating laboratories were compared. For a subset of identified differences, laboratories documented the basis for discordance, shared internal data, independently reassessed with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines, and then compared-interpretations. Results: At least two of the participating laboratories interpreted 6,169 variants in ClinVar, of which 88.3% were initially concordant. Laboratories reassessed 242/724 initially discordant variants, of which 87.2% (211) were resolved by reassessment with current criteria and/or internal data sharing; 12.8% (31) of reassessed variants remained discordant owing to differences in the application of the ACMG-AMP guidelines. Conclusion: Participating laboratories increased their overall concordance from 88.3 to 91.7%, indicating that sharing variant interpretations in ClinVar-thereby allowing identification of differences and motivation to resolve those differences-is critical to moving toward more consistent variant interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1104
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid communication of efforts to resolve differences or update variant interpretations in ClinVar through case-level data sharing
    Rehm, Heidi
    [J]. COLD SPRING HARBOR MOLECULAR CASE STUDIES, 2018, 4 (05):
  • [2] Scaling resolution of variant classification differences in ClinVar between 41 clinical laboratories through an outlier approach
    Harrison, Steven M.
    Dolinksy, Jill S.
    Chen, Wenjie
    Collins, Christin D.
    Das, Soma
    Deignan, Joshua L.
    Garber, Kathryn B.
    Garcia, John
    Jarinova, Olga
    Johnson, Amy E. Knight
    Koskenvuo, Juha W.
    Lee, Hane
    Mao, Rong
    Mar-Heyming, Rebecca
    McFaddin, Andrew S.
    Moyer, Krista
    Nagan, Narasimhan
    Rentas, Stefan
    Santani, Avni B.
    Seppala, Eija H.
    Shirts, Brian H.
    Tidwell, Timothy
    Topper, Scott
    Vincent, Lisa M.
    Vinette, Kathy
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2018, 39 (11) : 1641 - 1649
  • [3] ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence
    Landrum, Melissa J.
    Lee, Jennifer M.
    Benson, Mark
    Brown, Garth R.
    Chao, Chen
    Chitipiralla, Shanmuga
    Gu, Baoshan
    Hart, Jennifer
    Hoffman, Douglas
    Jang, Wonhee
    Karapetyan, Karen
    Katz, Kenneth
    Liu, Chunlei
    Maddipatla, Zenith
    Malheiro, Adriana
    McDaniel, Kurt
    Ovetsky, Michael
    Riley, George
    Zhou, George
    Holmes, J. Bradley
    Kattman, Brandi L.
    Maglott, Donna R.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (D1) : D1062 - D1067
  • [4] Copy number variant discrepancy resolution using the ClinGen dosage sensitivity map results in updated clinical interpretations in ClinVar
    Riggs, Erin R.
    Nelson, Tristan
    Merz, Andrew
    Ackley, Todd
    Bunke, Brian
    Collins, Christin D.
    Collinson, Morag N.
    Fan, Yao-Shan
    Goodenberger, McKinsey L.
    Golden, Denae M.
    Haglund-Hazy, Linda
    Krgovic, Danijela
    Lamb, Allen N.
    Lewis, Zoe
    Li, Guang
    Liu, Yajuan
    Meck, Jeanne
    Neufeld-Kaiser, Whitney
    Runke, Cassandra K.
    Sanmann, Jennifer N.
    Stavropoulos, Dimitri J.
    Strong, Emma
    Su, Meng
    Tayeh, Marwan K.
    Vokac, Nadja Kokalj
    Thorland, Erik C.
    Andersen, Erica
    Martin, Christa L.
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2018, 39 (11) : 1650 - 1659
  • [5] Abbott Laboratories and Karo Bio collaborate in pre-clinical diabetes programme
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 1999, 1 (06): : 358 - 358
  • [6] Points to consider for sharing variant-level information from clinical genetic testing with ClinVar
    Azzariti, Danielle R.
    Riggs, Erin Rooney
    Niehaus, Annie
    Rodriguez, Laura Lyman
    Ramos, Erin M.
    Kattman, Brandi
    Landrum, Melissa J.
    Martin, Christa L.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    [J]. COLD SPRING HARBOR MOLECULAR CASE STUDIES, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [7] The value of genomic variant ClinVar submissions from clinical providers: Beyond the addition of novel variants
    Wain, Karen E.
    Palen, Emily
    Savatt, Juliann M.
    Shuman, Devin
    Finucane, Brenda
    Seeley, Andrea
    Challman, Thomas D.
    Myers, Scott M.
    Martin, Christa Lese
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2018, 39 (11) : 1660 - 1667
  • [8] Clinical implications of conflicting variant interpretations in the cancer genetics clinic
    Zukin, Elyssa
    Culver, Julie O.
    Liu, Yuxi
    Yang, Yunqi
    Ricker, Charite N.
    Hodan, Rachel
    Sturgeon, Duveen
    Kingham, Kerry
    Chun, Nicolette M.
    Rowe-Teeter, Courtney
    Singh, Kathryn
    Zell, Jason A.
    Ladabaum, Uri
    McDonnell, Kevin J.
    Ford, James M.
    Parmigiani, Giovanni
    Braun, Danielle
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Gruber, Stephen B.
    Idos, Gregory E.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (07)
  • [9] Do Imaging Core Laboratories Better Predict Progression Over Clinical Interpretations?
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Ruchalski, Kathleen L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2023, 5 (05):
  • [10] COSTS, SERVICE DIFFERENCES, AND PRICES IN PRIVATE CLINICAL LABORATORIES
    BAILEY, RM
    TIERNEY, TM
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1974, 52 (03): : 265 - 289