Underuse of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Patients at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Murphy, Caitlin C. [1 ]
Lewis, Carmen L. [2 ]
Golin, Carol E. [3 ,4 ]
Sandler, Robert S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Gastrointestinal Biol & Dis, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 110卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; OF-THE-LITERATURE; FACTORIAL VALIDITY; UNITED-STATES; PREDICTORS; INVARIANCE; POPULATION; NAVIGATION; INTERVENTION; POLYPECTOMY;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2014.344
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality have declined over the past two decades, and much of this improvement is attributed to increased use of screening. Approximately 25% of patients who undergo screening colonoscopy have premalignant adenomas that require removal and follow-up colonoscopy. However, there are few studies of the use of surveillance colonoscopy in increased risk patients with previous adenomas. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine factors associated with underuse of surveillance colonoscopy among patients who are at increased risk for colorectal cancer. The study population consisted of patients with previously identified adenomatous polyps and who were due for follow-up colonoscopy. Patients were categorized as attenders (n=100) or non-attenders (n=104) on the basis of completion of follow-up colonoscopy. Telephone surveys assessed the use of surveillance colonoscopy across domains of predisposing patient characteristics, enabling factors, and patient need. Mutlivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with screening completion. RESULTS: Perceived barriers, perceived benefits, social deprivation, and cancer worry were associated with attendance at colonoscopy. Higher benefits (odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-5.41) and cancer worry (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.79) increased the odds of attendance at follow-up colonoscopy, whereas greater barriers (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.88) and high social deprivation (>= 2; OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.76) were associated with lower odds. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that multilevel factors contribute to the use of surveillance colonoscopy in higher risk populations, many of which are amenable to intervention. Interventions, such as patient navigation, may help facilitate appropriate use of surveillance colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 641
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
    Digby, Jayne
    Cleary, Shirley
    Gray, Lynne
    Datt, Pooja
    Goudie, David R.
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    Strachan, Judith A.
    Humphries, Adam
    Fraser, Callum G.
    Mowat, Craig
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (05) : 559 - 566
  • [3] Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer
    Bradshaw, N
    Holloway, S
    Penman, I
    Dunlop, MG
    Porteous, MEM
    GUT, 2003, 52 (12) : 1748 - 1751
  • [4] THE USE OF FAECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS TO TRIAGE CASES FOR COLONOSCOPY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURVEILLANCE FOR AN INCREASED RISK OF DEVELOPING COLORECTAL CANCER
    Berwald, Grace M.
    Young, Graeme P.
    Cock, Charles
    Bampton, Peter A.
    Fraser, Robert
    Symonds, Erin L.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S599 - S599
  • [5] Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer
    Van Gelder, RE
    Nio, CY
    Florie, J
    Bartelsman, JF
    Snel, P
    De Jager, SW
    Van Deventer, SJ
    Laméris, JS
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Stoker, J
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 127 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [6] Computed Tomography Colonography Compared With Colonoscopy for Patients at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer
    Peek, Richard
    Reddy, Rajender
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 137 (03) : 751 - 752
  • [7] Risk of colorectal cancer after colonoscopy with polypectomy: Implications for surveillance
    Brenner, H.
    Chang-Claude, J.
    Seiler, C.
    Sturmer, T.
    Hoffmeister, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 : 34 - 34
  • [8] The value of a colonoscopy-based surveillance program (CSP) for people at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC)
    Chow, E.
    Lane, J. M.
    Cole, S. R.
    Bampton, P. A.
    Young, G. P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 23 : A204 - A204
  • [9] The value of a colonoscopy-based surveillance program (Csp) for people at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC)
    Chow, Elizabeth C.
    Lane, Joanne M.
    Cole, Stephen
    Bampton, Peter A.
    Young, Graeme P.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A604 - A604
  • [10] Is colonoscopy sufficient for colorectal cancer surveillance in all HNPCC patients?
    Corleto, Vito D.
    Zykaj, Ermira
    Mercantini, Paolo
    Pilozzi, Emanuela
    Rossi, Michele
    Carnuccio, Antonella
    Di Giulio, Emilio
    Ziparo, Vincenzo
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 11 (47) : 7541 - 7544