Network tariff design with prosumers and electromobility: Who wins, who loses?

被引:38
|
作者
Hoarau, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Perez, Yannick [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Sud, Fac Jean Monnet, RITM, Sceaux, France
[2] Univ Paris 09, Climate Econ Chair, Paris, France
[3] Cent Supelec, LGI, Gif Sur Yvette, France
关键词
Electric vehicle; Prosumers; Distributed energy resources; Tariff design; Distribution grid; IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES; GRID COSTS; DEMAND; OWNERSHIP; IMPACTS; INCENTIVES; GENERATION; OPERATORS; SUBSIDIES; CHARGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), mostly in the form of solar photovoltaic (PV) or lithium-ion batteries, and electric vehicles (EVs) are emerging as three disruptive innovations in power grids. Recent studies have pointed out the potential synergies between these technologies, while others have studied the difficulty to design adequate network tariff when some consumers can adopt DERs (prosumers). In this paper, we investigate the combined effect of DERs and EVs on grid cost recovery. To study these effects, we formulate a non-cooperative game between a regulator that sets tariffs to recover grid costs and the four classes of network users depending on whether they are prosumer (resp. EV owners) or not. We study how tariff structures and the levels of EV penetration and prosuming affect tariffs. First, we find that grid cost recovery concerns caused by load-defecting prosumers installing DER can be balanced by the diffusion of EVs in the network. Second, we highlight that EVs and DERs adoptions are conflicting through the network tariff design. In particular, we find that the more a tariff structure gives incentives for DERs, the less beneficial it is for EVs. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Who Loses and Who Wins?
    Currell, David
    [J]. MLN, 2020, 135 (05) : 1184 - 1198
  • [2] Who wins loses
    Bourdages, Etienne
    [J]. JEU-REVUE DE THEATRE, 2005, 114 : 72 - 76
  • [3] Gambling: Who wins? Who loses?
    Ottaway, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2004, 55 (02): : 308 - 309
  • [4] The Euro: Who wins? Who loses?
    Frieden, J
    [J]. FOREIGN POLICY, 1998, (112) : 24 - +
  • [5] Gambling: Who wins? Who loses?
    Dunham, J
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2003, 128 (09) : 110 - 110
  • [6] Immigration: Who wins, who loses
    不详
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 14 (01) : 87 - 89
  • [7] Gambling: Who wins? Who loses?
    Casey, E
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 39 (01): : 170 - 172
  • [8] Aspiration or pragmatism: Who wins, who loses?
    Hofmeister, John
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2009, 88 (09): : 36 - +
  • [9] TRIP CHAINING: WHO WINS WHO LOSES?
    de Palma, Andre
    Dunkerley, Fay
    Proost, Stef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2010, 19 (01) : 223 - 258
  • [10] Diets and Dieting: Who Wins, Who Loses?
    Katz, David L.
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS, 2009, 3 (02) : 81 - 82