Transition and adjustments of Slovene agriculture to EU accession

被引:0
|
作者
Rednak, M
Volk, T
Erjavec, E
机构
[1] Landwirtsch Inst Sloweniens, Abt Landwirtschaftsokonomik, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fak, Lehrstuhl Agrarokonomie Polit & Recht, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT | 2003年 / 81卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The paper describes the changes in Slovenian agriculture and agricultural policy in the period 1993-2001 in light of the foreseen Slovenia's accession to the European Union. Agriculture in Slovenia is characterised by less-favourable natural and structural conditions for agricultural production, which also explains its status of a net importer of food and its relatively protectionist agricultural policy. The period of transition was also a period of a thorough restructuring of the agricultural policy. The policy was gradually brought into line with the goals and mechanisms of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and even before accession Slovenia started to implement CAP-like measures, including direct payments and rural development policy measures. Slovenia is thus the only candidate country for EU accession with the level of supports to agriculture comparable with the level of support in the European Union. In its negotiations for EU membership, Slovenia agreed on the same level of direct payments for Slovenian farmers as received by farmers in the European Union, only that in the first period, they will be largely covered from the national budget. A comprehensive rural development programme will enable Slovenia to reorient to the new CAP goals and to pursue a more target-oriented and transparent policy. As a result of the outcome of negotiations, the economic position of Slovenian farmers after accession is not expected to change markedly on the aggregate level, particularly if all the necessary steps are made with regard to the building of an efficient system for the transposition of CAP. Accession to the EU will, however, not solve the problem of relatively poor competitiveness of the agricultural sector in Slovenia, which still has to undergo comprehensive structural changes and adjustments.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 636
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bulgarian agriculture and EU accession
    Ivanova, Nedka
    Peneva, Mariya
    Mishev, Plamen
    Golemanova, Antoaneta
    Erjavec, Emil
    [J]. POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2007, 19 (03) : 263 - 280
  • [2] THE COMPETITIVENESS OF POLISH AGRICULTURE AFTER ACCESSION TO THE EU
    Wigier, Marek
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2014, 61 (01): : 87 - 102
  • [3] Transition, EU Accession and Structural Convergence
    János Gács
    [J]. Empirica, 2003, 30 (3) : 271 - 303
  • [4] Between transition, WTO, and EU accession: Agriculture and agricultural policies in formerly centrally planned countries
    Swinnen, JFM
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM AND THE WTO: WHERE ARE WE HEADING?, 2004, : 43 - 65
  • [5] FINANCIAL MEASURES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR EU ACCESSION
    Peric, Renata
    Odobasa, Rajko
    Konjic, Emina
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH V, 2009, 5 : 771 - 780
  • [6] STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN SLOVAK AGRICULTURE AFTER EU ACCESSION
    Toth, Marian
    Rabek, Tomas
    Holubek, Ivan
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, 2018, : 924 - 931
  • [7] The Economic Resilience of the Austrian Agriculture since the EU Accession
    Quendler, Erika
    Morkunas, Mangirdas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (10)
  • [8] The welfare state in transition economies and accession to the EU
    Wagener, HJ
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2002, 25 (02) : 152 - +
  • [9] Between transition and EU accession: Hungary at the millennium
    Csaba, L
    [J]. EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 2000, 52 (05) : 805 - 827
  • [10] STRUCTURE OF BULGARIAN AGRICULTURE 10 YEARS AFTER THE ACCESSION TO THE EU
    Beluhova-Uzunova, Rositsa
    Hristov, Krum
    Shishkova, Mariyana
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 18 (02) : 29 - 34