Foot pressures during gait: A comparison of techniques for reducing pressure points

被引:7
|
作者
Lawless, MW [1 ]
Reveal, GT [1 ]
Laughlin, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dayton, OH 45409 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110070102200712
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Various methods have been used to redistribute plantar surface foot pressure in patients with foot ulcers. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of four modalities (fracture walker, fracture walker with insert, and open and closed toe total contact casts) in reducing plantar foot pressure. Methods: Ten healthy, normal volunteer subjects had an F-scan sensor (ultra thin shoe insert pressure monitor) placed under the right foot. They then ambulated on a flat surface, maintaining their normal gait. Dynamic plantar pressures were averaged over 10 steps at four different sites (plantar surface of great toe, first metatarsal head, base of fifth metatarsal, and plantar heel). All subjects repeated this sequence under five different testing conditions (barefoot, with a fracture walker, fracture walker with arch support insert, open and closed toe total contact cast). Each subject's barefoot pressures were then compared with the pressures during the different modalities. Results: All four treatment modalities significantly reduced (p < 0.05) plantar pressure at the first metatarsal head (no method was superior). The fracture walker, fracture walker with insert, and open toe total contact cast significantly reduced pressure at the heel. Pressures at the base of the fifth metatarsal and great toe were not significantly reduced with any treatment form. Conclusion: The fracture walker, with and without arch support, and total contact cast can effectively reduce plantar pressure at the heel and first metatarsal head.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 597
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Center of pressure trajectory during gait: A comparison of four foot positions
    Lugade, Vipul
    Kaufman, Kenton
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 40 (04) : 719 - 722
  • [2] FOOT PRESSURE PATTERNS DURING GAIT
    SOAMES, RW
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1985, 7 (02): : 120 - 126
  • [3] Foot joint pressures during dynamic gait simulation
    W Brent Edwards
    Erin D Ward
    Timothy R Derrick
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 1 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] A comparison of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressures
    Wearing, SC
    Urry, S
    Smeathers, JE
    Battistutta, D
    GAIT & POSTURE, 1999, 10 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [5] Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Forghany, Saeed
    Landorf, Karl B.
    Levinger, Pazit
    Murley, George S.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 62 : 235 - 240
  • [6] Reducing plantar pressure in the neuropathic foot - A comparison of footwear
    Lavery, LA
    Vela, SA
    Fleischli, JG
    Armstrong, DG
    Lavery, DC
    DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (11) : 1706 - 1710
  • [7] Reducing dynamic foot pressures in high-risk diabetic subjects with foot ulcerations - A comparison of treatments
    Lavery, LA
    Vela, SA
    Lavery, DC
    Quebedeaux, TL
    DIABETES CARE, 1996, 19 (08) : 818 - 821
  • [8] A Comparison of Gait Function and Regionalized Foot Pressure According to the Primary Symptomatic Foot Area of Patients with Rheumatoid Foot
    Park, Dae Sung
    Hwang, Ji Hye
    Chang, Hyun Jung
    Koh, Eun Mi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2011, 23 (05) : 807 - 811
  • [9] Detecting Gait Anomalies Based on the Analysis of Foot Pressures
    Zawadzki, Pavel
    Starzynski, Jacek
    2019 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (CPEE), 2019, : 264 - 267
  • [10] Experimental tests for foot pressure analysis during orthostatic position and gait
    Ganea, Daniel
    Mereuta, Elena
    Veresiu, Silvia
    Rus, Madalina
    Amortila, Valentin
    21ST INNOVATIVE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING & ENERGY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - IMANE&E 2017, 2017, 112