A Method for Forage Yield and Quality Assessment of Tall Fescue Cultivars in the Spring

被引:1
|
作者
Cherney, J. H. [1 ]
Parsons, D. [2 ]
Cherney, D. J. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2011.01.0047
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Comparative evaluation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars for yield and quality is confounded with cultivar maturity differences if all cultivars are harvested on the same day; harvesting on different days at a similar morphological stage confounds quality with day-to-day environmental fluctuations. Forage grasses should be harvested at optimum fiber content for the class of livestock being fed. For lactating dairy cattle, optimum is approximately 500 g kg(-1) neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Our goal was to develop a system to adjust yield and quality of each cultivar to the date of optimum NDF content for harvest. Tall fescue cultivars were sampled on five to eight dates during late spring growth for five trials in New York State. Rates of change per day for yield, NDF, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD) were used to adjust these parameters to the date of optimum NDF content. Rates of change in yield and quality among cultivars were similar within an environment but were not similar across environments. Harvesting cultivars on a single date biased the yields of both early and late maturing cultivars. Cultivar heading dates were not well correlated with NDF or NDFD, indicating that heading date was not a useful adjustment parameter. Adjustment of yield and NDFD to the optimum spring harvest date for each cultivar in a trial significantly changed cultivar ranking. This method should be feasible for evaluating cultivars of any cool-season grass species but requires further testing for other species.
引用
收藏
页码:2878 / 2885
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forage yield and quality assessment of tall fescue varieties.
    Cherney, D. J. R.
    Cherney, J. H.
    Parsons, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 340 - 340
  • [3] Sulfur source and placement effects on forage yield and quality of established tall fescue
    Sweeney, DW
    Moyer, JL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1997, 89 (06) : 905 - 910
  • [4] EFFECTS OF DRECHSLERA-SOROKINIANA INFECTION ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF TALL FESCUE FORAGE
    SMITH, MA
    WATSON, CE
    WATSON, VH
    TREVATHAN, LE
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 15 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [5] RELATIONSHIP OF LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS TO FORAGE YIELD OF TALL FESCUE
    NELSON, CJ
    ASAY, KH
    HORST, GL
    CROP SCIENCE, 1975, 15 (04) : 476 - 478
  • [6] QUALITY OF TALL FESCUE FORAGE AFFECTED BY MEFLUIDIDE
    GLENN, S
    RIECK, CE
    ELY, DG
    BUSH, LP
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1980, 28 (02) : 391 - 393
  • [7] CRICKETS IN A BIOASSAY OF FORAGE QUALITY IN TALL FESCUE
    ASAY, KH
    MINNICK, TR
    GARNER, GB
    HARMON, BW
    CROP SCIENCE, 1975, 15 (04) : 585 - 588
  • [8] EFFECTS OF N, P, AND K FERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF TALL FESCUE FORAGE IN WINTER
    BALASKO, JA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (03) : 425 - 428
  • [9] Endophyte-free tall fescue cultivars grazed by sheep: Forage quality and sward characteristics
    Vecellio, LC
    Jung, GA
    Harpster, HW
    Shaffer, JA
    Engle, CE
    Everhart, JR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1995, 87 (06) : 1169 - 1175
  • [10] MEFLUIDIDE TREATMENT OF TALL FESCUE PASTURES - FORAGE QUALITY
    TURNER, KE
    PATERSON, JA
    KERLEY, MS
    FORWOOD, JR
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1990, 68 (10) : 3406 - 3411