E-learning website evaluation and selection using multi-attribute decision making matrix methodology

被引:14
|
作者
Garg, Rakesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Hindu Coll Engn, Sonepat CSE, Sonepat 131001, Haryana, India
关键词
matrix method; multi-attribute decision making (MADM); ranking criteria; RANKING;
D O I
10.1002/cae.21846
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
E-learning website selection is a deliberate decision with a significant influence on the educational sector. E-learning website selection decision is based on multiple attributes/criteria. In the present research, the various attributes having a huge influence in the evaluation process of E-learning websites that are termed collectively as ranking criteria were identified and extracted from the available literature at the first step. Now, the relative importance or the significance of each ranking criteria was determined by collecting data through the interviews with experts and applying some aggregate operations on that data. Simply, the priority weight of each ranking criteria was determined at the second step. The third step is concerned with the evaluation work of the alternatives against the identified ranking criteria by considering the priority weights determined at the second step. In the present study, E-learning websites selection problem is resolved using matrix method which is capable to solve such types of multiple-attribute decision making (MADM) problems. Further, the results obtained from the proposed methodology are compared with the existing approaches namely Weighted Distance Based Approximation and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution to validate the applicability and utility of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 947
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning and strategy selection in multi-attribute decision making
    Arndt, Broeder
    Tilmann, Betsch
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 547 - 547
  • [2] Evaluation of Decision-making Quality using Multi-attribute Decision Matrix and Design Thinking
    Martinez-Lopez, J. Israel
    Arriaga Gonzalez, Carolina Michelle
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON 2020), 2020, : 622 - 629
  • [3] An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection
    Gong, Jia-Wei
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    You, Xiao-Yue
    Yin, Linsen
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 102
  • [4] Green Cutting Fluid Selection using Multi-attribute Decision Making Approach
    Jagadish
    Ray A.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2015, 96 (1) : 35 - 39
  • [5] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Methodology for Evaluation of Mechanical Product
    Chen, Yuan
    Li, Bing
    Yang, Xiaojun
    [J]. ADVANCED DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE III, 2011, 450 : 534 - 538
  • [6] Application of Multi-Attribute Decision Making Approach to Learning Management Systems Evaluation
    Arh, Tanja
    Blazic, Borka Jerman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, 2007, 2 (10) : 28 - 37
  • [7] Selection of engine oil using multi-attribute decision-making methods
    Salunke, Akash
    Lokhande, Ajit
    Neharkar, Akash
    Satpute, Rupesh
    Kamble, Avinash
    [J]. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2022, 42 (01) : 96 - 117
  • [8] Multi-attribute decision making for retaining structure selection using fuzzy logic
    Ryoo, BY
    Adams, TM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING IN CIVIL AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 1997, : 1383 - 1388
  • [9] Evaluation Model of Credibility of E-Commerce Website Using Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making: Based on Fuzzy Structured Element
    Zhao, Hongxia
    Yang, Jiaoping
    Wan, Jun
    [J]. FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 1, 2010, 78 : 417 - +
  • [10] Multi-attribute Evaluation of Website Quality in E-business Using an Integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Methodology
    Kaya, Tolga
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (03) : 301 - 314