The Accurate Measurement of Students' Learning in E-Learning Environments

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Sunbok [1 ]
Choi, Youn-Jeng [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Song [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Educ, Seoul 03760, South Korea
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Teaching & Learning Technol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 21期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
massive open online courses; equating; common metric; fixed-parameter calibration; item response theory; ITEM;
D O I
10.3390/app11219946
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The ultimate goal of E-learning environments is to improve students' learning. To achieve that goal, it is crucial to accurately measure students' learning. In the field of educational measurement, it is well known that the key issue in the measurement of learning is to place test scores on a common metric. Despite the crucial role of a common metric in the measurement of learning, however, less attention has been paid to this important issue in E-learning studies. In this study, we propose to use fixed-parameter calibration (FPC) in an item response theory (IRT) framework to set up a common metric in E-learning environments. To demonstrate FPC, we used the data from the MOOC "Introduction to Psychology as a Science " offered through Coursera collaboratively by Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT) and Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in 2013. Our analysis showed that the students' learning gains were substantially different with and without FPC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Situated Computing and Virtual Learning Environments e-Learning and the Benefits to the Students Learning
    Austin, Ron
    Sharma, Mak
    Moore, Philip
    Newell, David
    [J]. 2013 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT, AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (CISIS), 2013, : 523 - 528
  • [2] Mining the Students' Preferences Regarding e-Learning Environments
    Lacurezeanu, Ramona
    Bresfelean, Vasile Paul
    Buchmann, Robert
    [J]. SEPADS'10: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2010, : 250 - 254
  • [3] Individual work of students in contemporary e-learning environments
    Panina, Tatyana S.
    Dochkin, Sergey A.
    Pahomova, Elena A.
    Kostyuk, Natalja V.
    [J]. DILEMAS CONTEMPORANEOS-EDUCACION POLITICA Y VALORES, 2019, 6
  • [4] Accessibility for e-Learning environments
    Guenaga, ML
    Burger, D
    Oliver, J
    [J]. COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS: PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3118 : 157 - 163
  • [5] ENHANCING PROACTIVITY OF STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
    Biskupic, Ivana Ogrizek
    Lackovic, Stjepan
    Jurina, Kresimir
    [J]. EDULEARN14: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, : 2110 - 2119
  • [6] E-LEARNING IN COMPANY ENVIRONMENTS
    Seitlova, K.
    Czyz, H.
    [J]. EDULEARN13: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, : 758 - 766
  • [7] Students and e-learning: a longitudinal research study into university students opinions on e-learning
    Klement, Milan
    Dostal, Jiri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY CHALLENGES - TEACHERS FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2ND EDITION (EPC -TKS 2013), 2014, 128 : 175 - 180
  • [8] Students' Perceptions of ILS as a Learning-Style-Identification Tool in E-Learning Environments
    Marosan, Zoran
    Savic, Ninoslava
    Klasnja-Milicevic, Aleksandra
    Ivanovic, Mirjana
    Vesin, Boban
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [9] E-learning Platforms and E-learning Students: Building the Bridge to Success
    Rodrigues, Manuel
    Goncalves, Sergio
    Fdez-Riverola, Florentino
    Novais, Paulo
    [J]. ADCAIJ-ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL, 2012, 1 (02): : 21 - 34
  • [10] e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?
    Moore, Joi L.
    Dickson-Deane, Camille
    Galyen, Krista
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (02): : 129 - 135