3D Microendoscopic Electrical Impedance Tomography for Margin Assessment During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Mahara, Aditya [1 ]
Khan, Shadab [1 ]
Murphy, Ethan K. [1 ]
Schned, Alan R. [2 ,3 ]
Hyams, Elias S. [2 ,3 ]
Halter, Ryan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
Electrical impedance tomography; microendoscopic probe; prostate cancer; surgical margin assessment; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CAVERNOUS NERVES; EIT; SPECTROSCOPY; SYSTEM; IMAGES; RECONSTRUCTION; ALGORITHMS; ELECTRODES;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2015.2407833
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Radially configured microendoscopic electrical impedance probes intended for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were examined through simulation, bench-top experimentation, and ex vivo tissue studies. Three probe designs with 8, 9, and 17 electrodes, respectively, were analyzed through finite element method based simulations. One mm diameter spherical inclusions (sigma(inclusion) = 1 S/m) are positioned at various locations within a hemispherical background (sigma(inclusion) = 0.1 S/m) of radius 5 mm. An 8-electrode configuration is not able to localize the inclusion at these positions while 9 and 17-electrode configurations are able to accurately reconstruct the inclusion at maximum depth of 1 mm and 3 mm, respectively. All three probe designs were constructed and evaluated using saline phantoms and ex vivo porcine and human prostate tissues. The 17-electrode probe performed best in saline phantom studies, accurately reconstructing high contrast, 1-mm-diameter metal cylindrical inclusions in a saline bath (sigma(saline) = 0.1 S/m) with a position and area error of 0.46 mm and 0.84 mm(2), respectively. Additionally, the 17-electrode probe was able to adequately distinguish cancerous from benign tissues in three ex vivo human prostates. Simulations, bench-top saline experiments, and ex vivo tissue sampling suggest that for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during RALP, the 17-electrode probe (as compared to an 8 and 9 electrode probe) will be necessary to provide sufficient accuracy and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1601
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrical impedance map (EIM) for margin assessment during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using a microendoscopic probe
    Mahara, Aditya
    Khan, Shadab
    Schned, Alan R.
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Halter, Ryan J.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2015, 9415
  • [2] A Clinically Feasible Electrode Array for 3D Intraoperative Electrical Impedance Tomography-Based Surgical Margin Assessment in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Kossmann, Shannon E.
    Murphy, Ethan K.
    Doussan, Allaire F.
    Lloyd, Sophie
    Halter, Ryan J.
    [J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2024, 71 (11) : 3134 - 3145
  • [3] Toward Microendoscopic Electrical Impedance Tomography for Intraoperative Surgical Margin Assessment
    Halter, Ryan J.
    Kim, Young-Joong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 61 (11) : 2779 - 2786
  • [4] Robot-Assisted Electrical Impedance Scanning system for 2D Electrical Impedance Tomography tissue inspection
    Cheng, Zhuoqi
    Dall'Alba, Diego
    Fiorini, Paolo
    Savarimuthu, Thiusius Rajeeth
    [J]. 2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 3729 - 3733
  • [5] Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon
    Adili, Anthony F.
    Di Giovanni, Julia
    Kolesar, Emma
    Wong, Nathan C.
    Hoogenes, Jen
    Dason, Shawn
    Shayegan, Bobby
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (11): : E409 - E413
  • [6] Development of a Prediction Model for Positive Surgical Margin in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Hao, Ying
    Zhang, Qing
    Hang, Junke
    Xu, Linfeng
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (12) : 9560 - 9571
  • [7] A Randomized Controlled Study of Robot-Assisted versus 3D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Carcinoma Prostate
    Kapoor, Ketan Kumar
    Kumar, Anup
    [J]. ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2023, 2023
  • [8] Unexpected hemorrhage during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A case report
    Nakano S.
    Nakahira J.
    Sawai T.
    Kadono N.
    Minami T.
    [J]. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 10 (1)
  • [9] Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Simon, Ross M.
    Howard, Lauren E.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Terris, Martha K.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Aronson, William J.
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 618 - 623
  • [10] Improving fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The LaserSAFE technique
    Almeida-Magana, Ricardo
    Au, Matthew
    Al-Hammouri, Tarek
    Dinneen, Kate
    Haider, Aiman
    Freeman, Alex
    Shaw, Greg
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (06) : 677 - 679