Brain connectivity reflects human aesthetic responses to music

被引:61
|
作者
Sachs, Matthew E. [1 ]
Ellis, Robert J. [2 ,3 ]
Schlaug, Gottfried [2 ,3 ]
Loui, Psyche [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Psychol, 207 High St, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[5] Wesleyan Univ, Program Neurosci & Behav, 207 High St, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
关键词
music; chills; DTI; connectivity; psychophysiological; aesthetics; ARCUATE FASCICULUS; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; IMPAIRMENT; REWARD; EMOTIONS; REGIONS; CHILLS; SELF; MRI;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsw009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Humans uniquely appreciate aesthetics, experiencing pleasurable responses to complex stimuli that confer no clear intrinsic value for survival. However, substantial variability exists in the frequency and specificity of aesthetic responses. While pleasure from aesthetics is attributed to the neural circuitry for reward, what accounts for individual differences in aesthetic reward sensitivity remains unclear. Using a combination of survey data, behavioral and psychophysiological measures and diffusion tensor imaging, we found that white matter connectivity between sensory processing areas in the superior temporal gyrus and emotional and social processing areas in the insula and medial prefrontal cortex explains individual differences in reward sensitivity to music. Our findings provide the first evidence for a neural basis of individual differences in sensory access to the reward system, and suggest that social-emotional communication through the auditory channel may offer an evolutionary basis for music making as an aesthetically rewarding function in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 891
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brain Connectivity Networks and the Aesthetic Experience of Music
    Reybrouck, Mark
    Vuust, Peter
    Brattico, Elvira
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [2] AESTHETIC RESPONSES TO REPETITION IN UNFAMILIAR MUSIC
    Margulis, Elizabeth Hellmuth
    EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF THE ARTS, 2013, 31 (01) : 45 - 57
  • [3] Aesthetic responses to music: A questionnaire study
    Istok, Eva
    Brattico, Elvira
    Jacobsen, Thomas
    Krohn, Kaisu
    Mueller, Mira
    Tervaniemi, Mari
    MUSICAE SCIENTIAE, 2009, 13 (02) : 183 - 206
  • [4] The structural connectivity of higher order association cortices reflects human functional brain networks
    Jung, JeYoung
    Cloutman, Lauren L.
    Binney, Richard J.
    Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon
    CORTEX, 2017, 97 : 221 - 239
  • [5] Music Listening Modulates Functional Connectivity and Information Flow in the Human Brain
    Karmonik, Christof
    Brandt, Anthony
    Anderson, Jeff R.
    Brooks, Forrest
    Lytle, Julie
    Silverman, Elliott
    Frazier, Jefferson Todd
    BRAIN CONNECTIVITY, 2016, 6 (08) : 632 - 641
  • [6] WHITE MATTER CONNECTIVITY REFLECTS INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE CHILL RESPONSE TO MUSIC
    Sachs, Matthew
    Ellis, Robert
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Loui, Psyche
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 155 - 156
  • [7] fMRI reflects functional connectivity of human somatosensory cortex
    Blatow, Maria
    Nennig, Ernst
    Durst, Anita
    Sartor, Klaus
    Stippich, Christoph
    NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 37 (03) : 927 - 936
  • [8] Network Connectivity and Individual Responses to Brain Stimulation in the Human Motor System
    Cardenas-Morales, Lizbeth
    Volz, Lukas J.
    Michely, Jochen
    Rehme, Anne K.
    Pool, Eva-Maria
    Nettekoven, Charlotte
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2014, 24 (07) : 1697 - 1707
  • [9] Gradual pitch change and aesthetic responses of music majors
    Madsen, CK
    Geringer, JM
    BULLETIN OF THE COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN MUSIC EDUCATION, 2004, (161-62) : 135 - 143
  • [10] Toward automatic detection of brain responses to emotional music through analysis of EEG effective connectivity
    Shahabi, Hossein
    Moghimi, Sahar
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 58 : 231 - 239