Can machine learning predict drug nanocrystals?

被引:51
|
作者
He, Yuan [1 ]
Ye, Zhuyifan [1 ]
Liu, Xinyang [1 ]
Wei, Zhengjie [1 ]
Qiu, Fen [1 ]
Li, Hai-Feng [2 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ]
Ouyang, Defang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Inst Chinese Med Sci ICMS, State Key Lab Qual Res Chinese Med, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macau, Inst Appl Phys & Mat Engn, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Nanocrystals; Particle size; Polydispersity index (PDI); Prediction; POORLY SOLUBLE DRUGS; FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT; NANOSUSPENSIONS; TECHNOLOGY; SOLUBILITY; DELIVERY; BIOAVAILABILITY; DISCOVERY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.043
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Nanocrystals have exhibited great advantage for enhancing the dissolution rate of water insoluble drugs due to the reduced size to nanoscale. However, current pharmaceutical approaches for nanocrystals formulation development highly depend on the expert experience and trial-and-error attempts which remain time and resource consuming. In this research, we utilized machine learning techniques to predict the particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of nanocrystals. Firstly, 910 nanocrystal size data and 341 PDI data by three preparation methods (ball wet milling (BWM) method, high-pressure homogenization (HPH) method and antisolvent precipitation (ASP) method) were collected for the construction of the prediction models. The results demonstrated that light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) exhibited well performance for the nanocrystals size and PDI prediction with BWM and HPH methods, but relatively poor predictions for ASP method. The possible reasons for the poor prediction refer to low quality of data because of the poor reproducibility and instability of nanocrystals by ASP method, which also confirm that current commercialized products were mainly manufactured by BWM and HPH approaches. Notably, the contribution of the influence factors was ranked by the LightGBM, which demonstrated that milling time, cycle index and concentration of stabilizer are crucial factors for nanocrystals prepared by BWM, HPH and ASP, respectively. Furthermore, the model generalizations and prediction accuracies of LightGBM were confirmed experimentally by the newly prepared nanocrystals. In conclusion, the machine learning techniques can be successfully utilized for the predictions of nanocrystals prepared by BWM and HPH methods. Our research also reveals a new way for nanotechnology manufacture.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 285
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can machine learning methods predict beta?
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Lesseig, Vance
    Payne, Janet D.
    Quijano, Margot
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [2] Can Machine Learning Models Predict Inflation?
    Ivascu, Codrut
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 17 (01): : 1748 - 1756
  • [3] Machine Learning Meteorologist Can Predict Rain
    Quinn, Brandan
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 57 - 62
  • [4] Particle uptake in cancer cells can predict malignancy and drug resistance using machine learning
    Goldstein, Yoel
    Cohen, Ora T.
    Wald, Ori
    Bavli, Danny
    Kaplan, Tommy
    Benny, Ofra
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2024, 10 (22):
  • [5] Can machine learning predict recurrent cardiac arrest?
    Jennings, Jason B.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2023, 184
  • [6] CAN MACHINE LEARNING ACCURATELY PREDICT PAYER BEHAVIOR?
    Anstee, K.
    Muniandy, D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S396 - S396
  • [7] Machine learning can predict patterns of pulmonary function
    Tisi, Michael
    Wu, Joyce
    Hantos, Zoltan
    Valaee, Shahrokh
    Chow, Chung-Wai
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [8] Can machine learning predict responses to TNF inhibitors?
    Nisha Nair
    Anthony G. Wilson
    [J]. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2019, 15 : 702 - 704
  • [9] Can Machine Learning Predict Soccer Match Results?
    Capobianco, Giovanni
    Di Giacomo, Umberto
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Nardone, Vittoria
    Santone, Antonella
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICAART), VOL 2, 2019, : 458 - 465
  • [10] Can Machine Learning Predict the Phase Behavior of Surfactants?
    Thacker, Joseph C. R.
    Bray, David J.
    Warren, Patrick B.
    Anderson, Richard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2023, 127 (16): : 3711 - 3727