Quantifying Potential Yield and Yield Gaps of Soybean Using CROPGRO-Soybean Model in the Humid Tropics of Southwestern Ethiopia

被引:3
|
作者
Mekonnen, Ashebir [1 ,2 ]
Getnet, Mezegebu [3 ]
Nebiyu, Amsalu [4 ]
Abebe, Abush Tesfaye [5 ]
机构
[1] Jimma Univ, Coll Agr & Vet Med, Jimma, Ethiopia
[2] Wolaita Sodo Univ, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
[3] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, ICRISAT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[4] Jimma Univ, Dept Hort & Plant Sci, Coll Agr & Vet Med, Jimma, Ethiopia
[5] Int Inst Trop Agr, Ibadan, Nigeria
关键词
Crop model; Planting date; Soybean; Yield gap; Row spacing; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MOISTURE STRESS; PLANTING DATE; MANAGEMENT; PROSPECTS; SYSTEM; GROWTH; QUANTIFICATION; L;
D O I
10.1007/s42106-022-00218-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the past, much of the emphasis on soybean research in Ethiopia has been on the development and testing of new varieties and classical agronomic trials with limited use of crop models that help in estimating the potential yield and yield gaps, and identifying the most important barriers of achieving optimal yield. CROPGRO-soybean model is an important tool for estimating the potential yield and yield gaps of soybean under various management and environmental conditions. The objectives of this study, therefore, were to evaluate the performance of the model and quantify the potential yield, water-limited yield, and yield gaps of soybean in the humid environments of southwestern Ethiopia. The model calibration and evaluation were done with a field experiment conducted on sowing dates of Clark 63 k and SCS-1 soybean verities in 2019 and 2020. Model evaluation results revealed that the simulated phenological stages, growth, and yield of the two soybean varieties were in good agreement with the corresponding measured values. The evaluated model was used to quantify potential yield, water-limited yield, and yield gaps. The actual yield was obtained by averaging four districts' annual production data from 2014 to 2018 and survey data collected at the end of the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons. The mean actual yield for the dominantly cultivated soybean variety, Clark 63 k, was 1689 kg ha(-1); whereas the highest simulated potential yield and water-limited yields were 3632 kg ha(-1) and 3455 kg ha(-1), respectively. The yield gap due to water-limited ranged from 5 to 52% of the potential yield. Similarly, the yield gap percentage due to factors other than water-limited ranged from 7 to 51%. This percentage can be regarded as high relative to the efforts made to improve soybean productivity through varietal improvement in Ethiopia. Our findings show that poor distribution of rainfall and low night temperature during the reproductive stages of the crop due to delayed planting, and suboptimal use of row spacing represent the major causes of large yield gap percentage in the target area. The results of this study, therefore, revealed the importance of adopting optimum planting date in humid areas in maintaining the productivity gain achieved through varietal improvement. We suggest that adopting early planting date (between May 22 and June 7) and optimum row spacing (40 cm) help to enhance productivity and reduce yield gaps in soybean. In conclusion, the CROPGRO-soybean model can serve as a useful tool for quantifying the potential yield and yield gaps, and identify appropriate strategies that may help in increasing soybean productivity in Ethiopia.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 667
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Quantifying Potential Yield and Yield Gaps of Soybean Using CROPGRO-Soybean Model in the Humid Tropics of Southwestern Ethiopia
    Ashebir Mekonnen
    Mezegebu Getnet
    Amsalu Nebiyu
    Abush Tesfaye Abebe
    International Journal of Plant Production, 2022, 16 : 653 - 667
  • [2] Analysis of potential yields and yield gaps of rainfed soybean in India using CROPGRO-Soybean model
    Bhatia, V. S.
    Singh, Piara
    Wani, S. P.
    Chauhan, G. S.
    Rao, A. V. R. Kesava
    Mishra, A. K.
    Sriniuas, K.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2008, 148 (8-9) : 1252 - 1265
  • [3] Impact of projected climate on yield of soybean using CROPGRO-Soybean model in Madhya Pradesh
    Walikar, L. D.
    Bhan, Manish
    Giri, A. K.
    Dubey, A. K.
    Agrawal, K. K.
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 20 (03): : 211 - 215
  • [4] Adaptation and evaluation of the CROPGRO-soybean model to predict regional yield and production
    Jagtap, SS
    Jones, JW
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 93 (1-3) : 73 - 85
  • [5] Assessment of soybean yield variability in the southeastern US with the calibration of genetic coefficients from variety trials using CROPGRO-Soybean
    Perondi, Daniel
    Boote, Kenneth
    Noia Junior, Rogerio Souza
    Mulvaney, Michael
    Iboyi, Joseph
    Fraisse, Clyde
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (02) : 1100 - 1114
  • [6] Modelling the effect of soybean rust on soybean yield using the CSM CROPGRO: Soybean
    Rodrigues, R. A.
    Pedrini, J.
    Fraisse, C. W.
    Fernandes, J. C.
    Justino, F. B.
    Heinemann, A.
    Vale, F. X.
    Costa, L.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (07) : 101 - 102
  • [7] Utilization of the cropgro-soybean model to estimate yield loss caused by Asian rust in cultivars with different cycle
    Rodrigues, Rafael de Avila
    Pedrini, Joao Eduardo
    Fraisse, Clyde William
    Cunha Fernandes, Jose Mauricio
    Justino, Flavio Barbosa
    Heinemann, Alexandre Bryan
    Costa, Luiz Claudio
    Ribeiro do Vale, Francisco Xavier
    BRAGANTIA, 2012, 71 (02) : 308 - 317
  • [8] Impact Assessment of Climate Change on Soybean Crop Using CROPGRO-Soybean Model in Central India
    Bhan, Manish
    Patel, Deshraj
    Bal, Santanu K.
    Kumar, Puppala V.
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [9] Simulating yield potential by irrigation and yield gap of rainfed soybean using APEX model in a humid region
    Zhang, Bangbang
    Feng, Gary
    Kong, Xiangbin
    Lal, Rattan
    Ouyang, Ying
    Adeli, Ardeshir
    Jenkins, Johnie N.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 177 : 440 - 453
  • [10] Soybean Yield Simulation and Sustainability Assessment Based on the DSSAT-CROPGRO-Soybean Model
    Zhang, Lei
    Cao, Zhenxi
    Gao, Yang
    Huang, Weixiong
    Si, Zhuanyun
    Guo, Yuanhang
    Wang, Hongbo
    Wang, Xingpeng
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (17):