Temperature Correction and Result Evaluation of Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer for Chang'E-5 Mission

被引:6
|
作者
Lv, Gang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jinning [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chunlai [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Rui [1 ,2 ]
He, Zhiping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Tech Phys, Key Lab Space Act Optoelect Technol, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Moon; Temperature distribution; Surface treatment; Thermal analysis; Temperature measurement; Adaptive optics; Instruments; Acousto-optic tunable filter (AOTF) spectrometer; in situ spectral detection of lunar surface; lunar mineralogical spectrometer (LMS); temperature correction; thermal analysis model; MOON; REGION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2021.3112743
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The lunar mineralogical spectrometer (LMS) is the primary scientific payload of the Chang'E-5 mission of the China Lunar Exploration Program. The LMS is responsible for the in situ spectral detection and analysis of the sampling areas of interest on the Moon's surface. The LMS needs to adapt to a wide range of temperature conditions, varying between the lunar morning to noon, based on the time, location, and work process of the LMS. Thus, ensuring consistency in the spectral data obtained at high temperatures and a wide range of operating environments is a major challenge. In this study, a thermal analysis model of the LMS is built, and the temperature variation of the LMS during its operation on the lunar surface is simulated using the instrument workflow that is based on the simulation results. Independent experiments were also carried out for the temperature-sensitive components in the LMS, and subsequently, the temperature correction model and model coefficients for each temperature-sensitive component were obtained. The final correction result was a quantitative assessment of the ground test data and the in situ lunar detection data. For the ground tests at different temperatures, the average errors were found to be 0.57% and 1.2% for the short- and medium-wave data, respectively, after applying the temperature correction. When the LMS was operating on the lunar surface, the average errors for the short- and medium-ware data after the temperature correction were calculated to be 0.59% and 0.8%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer on Chang'E-5 Mission
    Xu, Rui
    Li, Chunlai
    Yuan, Liyin
    Lv, Gang
    Xu, Sheng
    Li, Feifei
    Jin, Jian
    Wang, Zhendong
    Pan, Wei
    Wang, Rong
    Wang, Meizhu
    Xie, Jianan
    Yang, Jie
    Wang, Jianyu
    He, Zhiping
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2022, 218 (05)
  • [2] Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer on Chang’E-5 Mission
    Rui Xu
    Chunlai Li
    Liyin Yuan
    Gang Lv
    Sheng Xu
    Feifei Li
    Jian Jin
    Zhendong Wang
    Wei Pan
    Rong Wang
    Meizhu Wang
    Jianan Xie
    Jie Yang
    Jianyu Wang
    Zhiping He
    [J]. Space Science Reviews, 2022, 218
  • [3] Experimental Ground Validation of Spectral Quality of the Chang' E-5 Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer
    Cai Ting-ni
    Li Chun-lai
    He Zhi-ping
    Ren Xin
    Liu Bin
    Xu Rui
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39 (01) : 257 - 262
  • [4] Characteristics of the lunar samples returned by the Chang'E-5 mission
    Li, Chunlai
    Hu, Hao
    Yang, Meng-Fei
    Pei, Zhao-Yu
    Zhou, Qin
    Ren, Xin
    Liu, Bin
    Liu, Dawei
    Zeng, Xingguo
    Zhang, Guangliang
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Liu, Jianjun
    Wang, Qiong
    Deng, Xiangjin
    Xiao, Caijin
    Yao, Yonggang
    Xue, Dingshuai
    Zuo, Wei
    Su, Yan
    Wen, Weibin
    Ouyang, Ziyuan
    [J]. NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 9 (02)
  • [5] In-Situ Photometric Properties of Lunar Regolith Revealed by Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer on Board Chang'E-5 Lander
    Xu, Jiafei
    Wang, Meizhu
    Lin, Honglei
    Xu, Xuesen
    Liu, Bin
    Yan, Wei
    Yang, Yazhou
    Wang, Rong
    Liu, Chengyu
    Xu, Rui
    He, Zhiping
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (04)
  • [6] Characteristics of the lunar samples returned by the Chang'E-5 mission
    Chunlai Li
    Hao Hu
    Meng-Fei Yang
    Zhao-Yu Pei
    Qin Zhou
    Xin Ren
    Bin Liu
    Dawei Liu
    Xingguo Zeng
    Guangliang Zhang
    Hongbo Zhang
    Jianjun Liu
    Qiong Wang
    Xiangjin Deng
    Caijin Xiao
    Yonggang Yao
    Dingshuai Xue
    Wei Zuo
    Yan Su
    Weibin Wen
    Ziyuan Ouyang
    [J]. National Science Review, 2022, 9 (02) : 21 - 33
  • [7] Mineralogy and regolith maturity at the Chang'E-5 landing site inferred from the Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer
    Wu, Xing
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Yazhou
    Guo, Dijun
    Du, Jun
    Li, Shuai
    Lin, Honglei
    Fu, Xiaohui
    Xiao, Zhiyong
    Xu, Yuchen
    Xu, Rui
    He, Zhiping
    Zhang, Feng
    Lin, Yangting
    Zou, Yongliao
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 594
  • [8] Lunar orbit rendezvous phasing design for Chang’e-5 Mission
    Meng Z.
    Gao S.
    Sheng R.
    [J]. Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44 (05):
  • [9] Size, morphology, and composition of lunar samples returned by Chang'E-5 mission
    Hui Zhang
    Xian Zhang
    Guang Zhang
    Keqi Dong
    Xiangjin Deng
    Xiaosong Gao
    Yaodong Yang
    Yuan Xiao
    Xiao Bai
    Kaixin Liang
    Yiwei Liu
    Wenbin Ma
    Shaofan Zhao
    Ce Zhang
    Xiaojing Zhang
    Jian Song
    Wei Yao
    Hong Chen
    Weihua Wang
    Zhigang Zou
    Mengfei Yang
    [J]. Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy), 2022, 65 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [10] Size, morphology, and composition of lunar samples returned by Chang'E-5 mission
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhang, Xian
    Zhang, Guang
    Dong, Keqi
    Deng, Xiangjin
    Gao, Xiaosong
    Yang, Yaodong
    Xiao, Yuan
    Bai, Xiao
    Liang, Kaixin
    Liu, Yiwei
    Ma, Wenbin
    Zhao, Shaofan
    Zhang, Ce
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Song, Jian
    Yao, Wei
    Chen, Hong
    Wang, Weihua
    Zou, Zhigang
    Yang, Mengfei
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2022, 65 (02)