3D Printed Composite Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review

被引:8
|
作者
Mohaghegh, Sadra [1 ]
Hosseini, Seyedeh Fatemeh [1 ]
Rad, Maryam Rezai [2 ]
Khojasteh, Arash [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Dent Sci, Sch Dent, Dent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Antwerp, Dept Hlth & Med Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Biocompatible materials; printed scaffolds composites; three-dimensional printing; computer-aided design; tissue scaffolds; tissue engineering; MESOPOROUS BIOACTIVE GLASS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; POROUS SCAFFOLDS; HYDROXYAPATITE; FABRICATION; REGENERATION; POLYCAPROLACTONE; PHOSPHATE; POROSITY;
D O I
10.2174/1574888X16666210810111754
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of fabrication factors on both biological and physico-chemical features of 3-dimensional (3D) printed composite scaffolds. Method: Electronic search was done according to the PRISMA guideline in PubMed and Scopus databases limited to English articles published until May 2021. Studies in which composite scaffolds were fabricated through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-based methods were included. Articles regarding the features of the scaffolds fabricated through indirect techniques were excluded. Results: Full text of 121 studies were reviewed, and 69 met the inclusion criteria. According to analyzed studies, PCL and HA were the most commonly used polymer and ceramic, respectively. Besides, the solvent -based technique was the most commonly used composition technique. which enabled preparing blends with high concentrations of ceramic materials. The most common fabrication method used in the included studies was Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). The addition of bio-ceramics enhanced the mechanical features and the biological behaviors of the printed scaffolds in a ratio-dependent manner. However, studies that analyzed the effect of irk ceramic weight ratio showed that scaffolds with the highest ceramic content did not necessarily possess the optimal biological and non-biological features, Conclusion: The biological and physico-chemical behaviors of the scaffold can be affected by pre-printing factors, including utilized materials, composition techniques. and fabrication methods. Fabricating scaffolds with high mineral content as of the natural bone may not provide the optimal condition for hone formation, Therefore, it is recommended that future studies compare the efficiency of different kinds of biomaterials rather than different weight ratios of one type.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 709
页数:62
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review
    Yu Wen
    Sun Xun
    Meng Haoye
    Sun Baichuan
    Chen Peng
    Liu Xuejian
    Zhang Kaihong
    Yang Xuan
    Peng Jiang
    Lu Shibi
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 5 (09) : 1690 - 1698
  • [2] 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Turnbull, Gareth
    Clarke, Jon
    Picard, Frederic
    Riches, Philip
    Jia, Luanluan
    Han, Fengxuan
    Li, Bin
    Shu, Wenmiao
    [J]. BIOACTIVE MATERIALS, 2018, 3 (03) : 278 - 314
  • [3] DRUG ELUTING 3D PRINTED SCAFFOLDS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING
    Chakka, Jaidev
    Nakhla, David
    Saha, Sanjeeb
    Elangovan, Satheesh
    Salem, Aliasger
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S487 - S487
  • [4] 3D Printed Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Xu, Zhimin
    You, Qi
    Li, Jiale
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Ningning
    Sun, Jingchun
    Ha, Bing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2019, 13 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [5] Degradation of 3D Printed, Highly Porous, Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
    Walker, J. M.
    Dean, D.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S397 - S397
  • [6] Cell-Laden 3D Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Piard C.M.
    Chen Y.
    Fisher J.P.
    [J]. Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2015, 13 (4): : 245 - 255
  • [7] 3D printed bioceramic/biodegradable polymer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Yu, Jiayi
    Xu, Yanyi
    Li, Shan
    Seifert, Gabrielle
    Becker, Matthew
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [8] 3D printed foamed scaffolds for tissue engineering
    Esposito, Claudio
    Mazio, Claudia
    Cesarelli, Giuseppe
    Tammaro, Daniele
    Netti, Paolo Antonio
    Maffettone, Pier Luca
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2023, 29 (13-14)
  • [9] 3D printed gelatin/decellularized bone composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Fabrication, characterization and cytocompatibility study
    Kara, Aylin
    Distler, Thomas
    Polley, Christian
    Schneidereit, Dominik
    Seitz, Hermann
    Friedrich, Oliver
    Tihminlioglu, Funda
    Boccaccini, Aldo R.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2022, 15
  • [10] 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review in experimental animal studies
    Avanzi, Ingrid Regina
    Parisi, Julia Risso
    Souza, Amanda
    Cruz, Matheus Almeida
    Santi Martignago, Cintia Cristina
    Ribeiro, Daniel Araki
    Cavalcante Braga, Anna Rafaela
    Renno, Ana Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 111 (01) : 203 - 219