An Online Multi-Index Approach to Human Ergonomics Assessment in the Workplace

被引:17
|
作者
Lorenzini, Marta [1 ]
Kim, Wansoo [1 ,2 ]
Ajoudani, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Inst Technol, Human Robot Interfaces & Phys Interact Lab, I-16121 Genoa, Italy
[2] Hanyang Univ, Seoul 04763, South Korea
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Indexes; Ergonomics; Task analysis; Torque; Kinematics; Monitoring; Dynamics; Ergonomic assessment; human modeling; kinematics and dynamics monitoring; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; RISK-FACTORS; EXPOSURE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3133807
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) remain one of the major occupational safety and health problems in the European Union nowadays. Thus, continuous tracking of workers' exposure to the factors that may contribute to their develop- ment is paramount. This article introduces an online approach to monitor kinematic and dynamic quantities on the workers, providing on the spot an estimate of the physical load required in their daily jobs. A set of ergonomic indexes is defined to account for multiple potential contributors to WMSDs, also giving importance to the subject-specific requirements of the workers. To evaluate the proposed framework, a thorough experimental analysis was conducted on 12 human subjects considering tasks that represent typical working activities in the manufacturing sector. For each task, the ergonomic indexes that better explain the underlying physical load were identified, following a statistical analysis, and supported by the outcome of a surface electromyography analysis. A comparison was also made with a well-recognized and standard tool to evaluate human ergonomics in the workplace, to highlight the benefits introduced by the proposed framework. Results demonstrate the high potential of the proposed framework in identifying the physical risk factors, and therefore, to adopt preventive measures. Another equally important contribution of this article is the creation of a comprehensive database on human kinodynamic measurements, which hosts multiple sensory data of healthy subjects performing typical industrial tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 823
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Fuzzy Methods in Multi-index Assessment
    Li Yan
    Zhao Guanhua
    Li Xiurong
    Chen Baolin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, 2012, 2 : 516 - 521
  • [2] Multi-index Assignment Problem: an asymptotically optimal approach
    Gimadi, EK
    Kairan, NM
    [J]. ETFA 2001: 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 707 - 709
  • [3] The monomiality approach to multi-index polynomials in several variables
    Belingeri, Carlo
    Dattoli, Giuseppe
    Ricci, Paolo E.
    [J]. GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [4] THE MULTI-INDEX PROBLEM
    HALEY, KB
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1963, 11 (03) : 368 - 379
  • [5] The Inverted Multi-Index
    Babenko, Artem
    Lempitsky, Victor
    [J]. 2012 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2012, : 3069 - 3076
  • [6] The Inverted Multi-Index
    Babenko, Artem
    Lempitsky, Victor
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 37 (06) : 1247 - 1260
  • [7] On multi-index assignment polytopes
    Appa, G.
    Magos, D.
    Mourtos, I.
    [J]. LINEAR ALGEBRA AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2006, 416 (2-3) : 224 - 241
  • [8] THE MULTI-INDEX TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
    MOTZKIN, TS
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1952, 58 (04): : 494 - 494
  • [9] Multi-index risk assessment based on extenics and BP neural network
    Qiao Zhongliang
    Dong Fajun
    Wang Shanshan
    Xia Aiyue
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2007, 2 : 204 - 208
  • [10] Evaluation of the ecological status of an impaired watershed by using a multi-index approach
    Liliana Carvalho
    Rui Cortes
    Adriano A. Bordalo
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011, 174 : 493 - 508