A comparative study of wavelet-based ANN and classical techniques for geophysical time-series forecasting

被引:28
|
作者
Bhardwaj, Shivam [1 ]
Chandrasekhar, E. [2 ]
Padiyar, Priyanka [3 ]
Gadre, Vikram M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Earth Sci, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[3] Goa Coll Engn, Dept Elect & Telecommun Engn, Ponda 403401, Goa, India
关键词
Time-series forecasting; ARIMA models; Kalman filter algorithm; Wavelet transform; Artificial neural networks; NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104461
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Time-series modeling forms an important area of research in geophysics. Time-series models can be linear, like linear state-space models or non-linear, like artificial neural networks. One way to judge the goodness of different models associated with a given time-series is to assess the prediction capabilities of these models. Some of the important techniques used in time-series forecasting are: (i) Minimum mean squared error (MMSE) forecast obtained using conditional means of ARIMA(p,d,q) models, (ii) Kalman filter approach and (iii) Artificial neural networks (ANN) approach. However, the wavelet-based versions of these techniques, respectively denoted as W-MMSE, W-Kalman and W-ANN, rather than the original techniques themselves, have been found to possess better capabilities in forecasting the highly nonlinear geophysical data. Using the original and predicted data, these observations have been validated by determining the RMSE (root mean squared error) and correlation coefficients between them. The prediction capabilities of both versions of the above techniques are tested on (i) the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) data, (ii) the daily average rainfall data and (iii) the gamma-ray log data from an offshore oil well, off the west coast of India. The TEC and daily average rainfall data sets designate as examples of data with very high correlations pertaining over very large lags. They also have a strong seasonality component associated with them. However, the gamma-ray log data sets show no seasonality component and have no trends associated with them. Therefore, the choice of different nonlinear data sets having diverse sources of their origins are apt to test the forecasting capabilities of these techniques. It has been observed that W-ANN gives the best prediction, when compared with the other algorithms discussed in this paper. This is believed to be due to the use of non-linear activation function by ANNs to produce regression that results in capturing the inherent non-linear dynamics of the process effectively. The results also show the usefulness of discrete wavelet transform (DWT) coefficients as training features for both linear and non-linear forecasting approaches. The better performance of the wavelet-based forecasting algorithms can be attributed to the fact that DWT coefficients are wide-sense stationary sequences. Thus the wavelet-based versions of these models like W-MMSE and W-Kalman provide better fit to these coefficients, compared to the original time-series data itself.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A wavelet-based method for time series forecasting
    Dominguez, Gabriela
    Guevara, Miguel
    Mendoza, Marcelo
    Zamora, Juan
    [J]. 2012 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE CHILEAN COMPUTER SCIENCE SOCIETY (SCCC 2012), 2012, : 91 - 94
  • [2] Wavelet-Based Hydrological Time Series Forecasting
    Sang, Yan-Fang
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Sun, Fubao
    Chen, Yaning
    Liu, Yong
    Yang, Moyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (05)
  • [3] FORECASTING ANNUAL GEOPHYSICAL TIME-SERIES
    NOAKES, DJ
    HIPEL, KW
    MCLEOD, AI
    JIMENEZ, C
    YAKOWITZ, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1988, 4 (01) : 103 - 115
  • [4] Application of wavelet decomposition in time-series forecasting
    Zhang, Keyi
    Gencay, Ramazan
    Yazgan, M. Ege
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 158 : 41 - 46
  • [5] Wavelet-based filtering of intermittent events from geomagnetic time-series
    Kovács, P
    Carbone, V
    Vörös, Z
    [J]. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2001, 49 (12) : 1219 - 1231
  • [6] A Comparative Simulation Study of Classical and Machine Learning Techniques for Forecasting Time Series Data
    Iaousse, Mbarek
    Jouilil, Youness
    Bouincha, Mohamed
    Mentagui, Driss
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 19 (08) : 56 - 65
  • [7] Scaling behaviour of heartbeat intervals obtained by wavelet-based time-series analysis
    Ivanov, PC
    Rosenblum, MG
    Peng, CK
    Mietus, J
    Havlin, S
    Stanley, HE
    Goldberger, AL
    [J]. NATURE, 1996, 383 (6598) : 323 - 327
  • [8] Wavelet-based estimation of a semiparametric generalized linear model of fMRI time-series
    Meyer, FG
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (03) : 315 - 322
  • [9] Wavelet-based multiscale resolution analysis of real and simulated time-series of earthquakes
    Enescu, B
    Ito, K
    Struzik, ZR
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 164 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [10] A Comparative Study and Analysis of Time Series Forecasting Techniques
    Athiyarath S.
    Paul M.
    Krishnaswamy S.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2020, 1 (3)