THE INFLUENCE OF JET ENGINE NOISE ON HEARING OF TECHNICAL STAFF

被引:5
|
作者
Konopka, Wieslaw [1 ,2 ]
Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, Malgorzata [3 ]
Sliwinska-Kowalska, Mariola [4 ]
机构
[1] Polish Mothers Mem Hosp, Res Inst, Dept Otolaryngol, PL-93338 Lodz, Poland
[2] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Didact Pediat, Lodz, Poland
[3] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Dept Phys Hazards, Lodz, Poland
[4] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Clin Audiol & Phoniatr, Lodz, Poland
关键词
jet engine noise; hearing impairment; pure tone audiometry; distortion product otoacoustic emission; DPOAE; PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; THRESHOLDS; EXPOSURE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.13075/mp.5893.00045
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Due to high sound pressure levels (SPLs), noise produced by jet planes may be harmful to hearing of people working in their proximity The aim of this study was to assess the effects of exposure to jet engine noise on technical staff hearing. Material and Methods: The study comprised 60 men, aged 24-50 years, employed in army as technical staff and exposed to jet engine noise for 6-20 years. The control group were 50 non noise exposed males, aged 25-51 years. Exposure to noise emitted by jet engines was evaluated. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded in both groups. Results: Jet engines emitted broadband noise with spectrum dominated by components in the frequency range 315-6300 Hz (1/3 octave bands). Maximum A-weighted SPL during tests reached values of approx. 120-130 dB. Consequently, engine servicing personnel (even in the case of a single engine test) was exposed to noise (at A-weighted daily noise exposure level above 95 dB) exceeding permissible levels. Averaged audiometric hearing threshold levels of technical staff were higher (<= 17 dB HL, p < 0.001) than in the control group. Similarly the DPOAE amplitude was lower (5 17 dB SPL, p < 0.01) in the noise exposed subjects compared to the non exposed ones. Significant reduction of DPOAE levels was mainly noted for high frequencies (3-6 kHz). Conclusions: Despite the usage of hearing protection devices, both PTA and DPOAE consistently showed poorer hearing in engine-servicing personnel vs control group.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 592
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Jet engine noise
    不详
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 70 (01): : 63 - 64
  • [2] SNOWMOBILE ENGINE NOISE AND HEARING
    BESS, FH
    POYNOR, RE
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1972, 95 (02): : 164 - &
  • [3] Control of jet engine noise
    Schiff, M.I.
    S V Sound and Vibration, 1981, 15 (02): : 8 - 12
  • [4] EFFECT OF JET AIRCRAFT NOISE ON HEARING
    COLES, RRA
    KNIGHT, JJ
    NATURE, 1959, 184 (4701) : 1803 - 1804
  • [5] SPECTRUM OF COMPRESSOR NOISE OF JET ENGINE
    GRIFFITHS, JWR
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1964, 1 (02) : 127 - &
  • [6] REDUCING JET-ENGINE NOISE
    不详
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING, 1975, 47 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [7] JET ENGINE SIDELINE NOISE MEASUREMENTS
    OKEEFE, JV
    BIELAK, GW
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1967, 41 (06): : 1610 - &
  • [8] TURBO-JET ENGINE NOISE
    VONGIERKE, HE
    PARRACK, HO
    GANNON, WJ
    HANSEN, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1952, 24 (01): : 116 - 116
  • [9] A NEW JET ENGINE NOISE SUPPRESSOR
    LANE, RN
    MIKESKA, EE
    ANDERSON, CD
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1961, 33 (11): : 1683 - &
  • [10] EVALUATION OF JET-ENGINE NOISE
    不详
    INSTRUMENTATION TECHNOLOGY, 1973, 20 (04): : 45 - 45