Basolateral and central amygdala orchestrate how we learn whom to trust

被引:3
|
作者
Sladky, Ronald [1 ]
Riva, Federica [1 ]
Rosenberger, Lisa Anna [1 ]
van Honk, Jack [2 ,3 ]
Lamm, Claus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Cognit Emot & Methods Psychol, Social Cognit & Affect Neurosci Unit, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychol, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Cape Town, MRC Unit Risk & Resilience Mental Disorders, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
HIERARCHICAL PREDICTION ERRORS; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS; STRIA TERMINALIS; BASAL FOREBRAIN; RESTING STATE; BED NUCLEUS; REWARD; BEHAVIOR; LESIONS; BNST;
D O I
10.1038/s42003-021-02815-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sladky & Riva et al. investigated how human allocation of trust depends on brain activity of the amygdala, a core brain structure for social cognition. They found dissociated activation between the amygdala and the nucleus accumbens, the former coding for trust assignation, and the latter coding for trust reciprocation. Cooperation and mutual trust are essential in our society, yet not everybody is trustworthy. In this fMRI study, 62 healthy volunteers performed a repeated trust game, placing trust in a trustworthy or an untrustworthy player. We found that the central amygdala was active during trust behavior planning while the basolateral amygdala was active during outcome evaluation. When planning the trust behavior, central and basolateral amygdala activation was stronger for the untrustworthy player compared to the trustworthy player but only in participants who actually learned to differentiate the trustworthiness of the players. Independent of learning success, nucleus accumbens encoded whether trust was reciprocated. This suggests that learning whom to trust is not related to reward processing in the nucleus accumbens, but rather to engagement of the amygdala. Our study overcomes major empirical gaps between animal models and human neuroimaging and shows how different subnuclei of the amygdala and connected areas orchestrate learning to form different subjective trustworthiness beliefs about others and guide trust choice behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Basolateral and central amygdala orchestrate how we learn whom to trust
    Ronald Sladky
    Federica Riva
    Lisa Anna Rosenberger
    Jack van Honk
    Claus Lamm
    [J]. Communications Biology, 4
  • [2] Whom Can We Trust? How Groups, Networks and Institutions Make Trust Possible
    Sztompka, Piotr
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY, 2011, 26 (05) : 613 - 617
  • [3] Whom Can We Trust? How Groups, Networks, and Institutions Make Trust Possible
    Seyd, Ben
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2011, 9 (03) : 415 - 416
  • [4] Whom Can We Trust? How Groups, Networks, and Institutions Make Trust Possible
    Collett, Jessica L.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2013, 42 (04) : 551 - 552
  • [5] WHOM CAN WE TRUST
    TODD, JS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (11): : 1566 - 1566
  • [6] Whom should we trust?
    Bridgman, Stuart
    [J]. Engineering and Technology, 2008, 3 (18): : 16 - 17
  • [7] THOSE FROM WHOM WE LEARN
    ROMANO, J
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MEDICINE, 1972, 117 (04): : 72 - &
  • [8] How do we learn to trust? A confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust
    Glanville, Jennifer L.
    Paxton, Pamela
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2007, 70 (03) : 230 - 242
  • [9] Just whom can we trust?
    Milo, P
    [J]. EE-EVALUATION ENGINEERING, 2002, 41 (11): : 6 - 6
  • [10] Trust and Social Categorization: Whom Can We Trust?
    Canadas, Elena
    Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa
    Lupianez, Juan
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 306 - 306