Prey to predator size ratio influences foraging efficiency of larval Aeshna juncea dragonflies

被引:35
|
作者
Hirvonen, H
Ranta, E
机构
[1] Integrative Ecology Unit, Division of Population Biology, Dept. of Ecology and Systematics, FIN-00014 Helsinki
关键词
predation; foraging behaviour; size ratio; prey density; handling time;
D O I
10.1007/BF00334569
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We investigated foraging behaviour of larval dragonflies Aeshna juncea in order to examine the significance of prey density and body size in predator-prey dynamics. A. juncea were offered separately three size-classes of Daphnia magna at low and high densities. The data were collected with direct observations of the foraging individuals. We found that large A. juncea larvae could better enhance their intake of prey biomass as prey size and prey density increased than their smaller conspecifics. However, increasing feeding efficiency of both larval instars was constrained by declining attack success and search rate with increasing prey size and density. With small D. magna, in contrast to large A. juncea, small A. juncea increased their searching efficiency as prey density increased keeping D. magna mortality rate at a constant level. In a predator-prey relationship this indicates stabilizing potential and feeding thresholds set by both prey density and prey-predator size ratio. Attack success dropped with prey size and density, but did not change in the course of the foraging bout. For both A. juncea sizes prey handling times increased as more medium and large prey were eaten. The slope of the increase became steeper with increasing prey-predator size ratio. These observations indicate that components of the predator-prey relationship vary with prey density, contrary to the basic assumptions of functional response equations. Moreover, the results suggest that the effects of prey density change during the ontogeny of predators and prey.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] PREDATOR-PREY RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LARVAL DRAGONFLIES, SALAMANDERS, AND FROGS
    CALDWELL, JP
    THORP, JH
    JERVEY, TO
    OECOLOGIA, 1980, 46 (03) : 285 - 289
  • [2] Prey size selection and distance estimation in foraging adult dragonflies
    R. M. Olberg
    A. H. Worthington
    J. L. Fox
    C. E. Bessette
    M. P. Loosemore
    Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2005, 191 : 791 - 797
  • [3] Prey size selection and distance estimation in foraging adult dragonflies
    Olberg, RM
    Worthington, AH
    Fox, JL
    Bessette, CE
    Loosemore, MP
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 191 (09): : 791 - 797
  • [4] PREDATOR AVOIDANCE, MICROHABITAT SHIFT, AND RISK-SENSITIVE FORAGING IN LARVAL DRAGONFLIES
    PIERCE, CL
    OECOLOGIA, 1988, 77 (01) : 81 - 90
  • [5] Thrice as easy to catch! Copper and temperature modulate predator-prey interactions in larval dragonflies and anurans
    Hayden, Mairin T.
    Reeves, Mari K.
    Holyoak, Marcel
    Perdue, Margaret
    King, Amanda L.
    Tobin, S. Carl
    ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (04):
  • [6] Predation risk between cannibalistic aeshnid dragonflies influences their functional response on a larval salamander prey
    Anderson, T. L.
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 300 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [7] Foraging efficiency of a predator flock for randomly moving prey: A simulation study
    Lee, Sang-Hee
    Kwon, Ohsung
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2016, 30 (09):
  • [8] Larval feeding experience influences adult predator acceptance of chemically defended prey
    Rayor, LS
    Munson, S
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2002, 104 (01) : 193 - 201
  • [9] Predator-prey mass ratio revisited: does preference of relative prey body size depend on individual predator size?
    Tsai, Cheng-Han
    Hsieh, Chih-hao
    Nakazawa, Takefumi
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 30 (12) : 1979 - 1987
  • [10] Spatial scale influences the outcome of the predator-prey space race between tadpoles and predatory dragonflies
    Hammond, John I.
    Luttbeg, Barney
    Brodin, Tomas
    Sih, Andrew
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 522 - 531