Excimer surface photoablation (PRK) versus lasik for correction of low myopia

Introduction: Above -6 diopters, Lasik procedure has shown its superiority in term of predictibility, efficacy and stability. In the adverse, in the field of low myopia, Lasik and surface excimer photoablation (PRK) are very controversial. We compare quantitative and qualitative outcome achieved in series of 25 PRK operated patients and 25 Lasik. Material and Method: 2 homogeneous groups were constituted: group A for Excimer patients and group B for Lasik. Initial ametropia had to be ranged between -2 and -6 diopters (D), eventually associated to a myopic astigmatism that needed to be under -1,75 D. Excimer laser model was a Visx (Visx 20/20 or Star S2). In case of Lasik, flap was performed with an Automated corneal shaper microkeratom (Baush & Lomb) or with a Flap Maker (loltech). Evaluation of refraction and visual results was associated to measurements of contrast and glare sensitivities and collection of functional complaints. Results: A retrospective analysis is performed with a 2 years follow-up, At that term, rate of eyes, that achieved 20/20 or better is comparable in the two groups (62% in group A and 64% in group B). However, profile of visual recovery goes faster after Lasik. Best corrected visual acuity is favorably preserved in two groups, but is altered with glare in Lasik group. Cycloplegic refraction shows a tendency to regression more important in case of surface ablation (10% versus 4%), especially above -4 D (28%). No significant difference is noted concerning contrast sensitivity, correctly unchanged in the two groups. No erase of severe complication is mentioned after both surgical methods. Discussion-Conclusion: In the field of low myopia, PRK and Lasik appear to guarantee same predictibility and safety, in conditions of preliminary learning curve. Stability and visual recovery are earlier achieved after Lasik, in addition to postoperative indolence. However, application of this technique to all degrees of myopia requires its perfect control and an adjustment of ablation nomograms.