Analyzing the Impact of the Discretization Method When Comparing Bayesian Classifiers

被引:0
|
作者
Julia Flores, M. [1 ]
Gamez, Jose A. [1 ]
Martinez, Ana M. [1 ]
Puerta, Jose M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Comp Syst Dept, I3A, Albacete, Spain
关键词
Discretization; Bayesian Classifiers; AODE; Naive Bayes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Most, of the 1110) 110(15 designed within 1,the framework of Bayesian net networks (BNs) assume that the involved variables ale Of discrete nature but this assumption rarely holds in real problem. The Bayesian classifier AODE (Aggregating One-Dependence Estimators) e g can only classifier directly with discrete variables The HAODE Hybrid AODE) classifier is proposed as an appealing alternative to 11 ODE which is less affected by the discretization process In this paper, study if this behavior holds when applying different discretization methods More importantly, (ye include other Bayesian classifiers in the comparison to find out. to., what extent, the type of discretization affects then results in terms of accuracy and bias-variance discretization If the type of discretization applied is not decisive, then future expel intents can be A: times faster, being the number of discretization methods considered.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Handling numeric attributes when comparing Bayesian network classifiers: does the discretization method matter?
    M. Julia Flores
    José A. Gámez
    Ana M. Martínez
    José M. Puerta
    [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2011, 34 : 372 - 385
  • [2] Handling numeric attributes when comparing Bayesian network classifiers: does the discretization method matter?
    Flores, M. Julia
    Gamez, Jose A.
    Martinez, Ana M.
    Puerta, Jose M.
    [J]. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 34 (03) : 372 - 385
  • [3] A hybrid discretization method for naive Bayesian classifiers
    Wong, Tzu-Tsung
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2012, 45 (06) : 2321 - 2325
  • [4] Comparing Bayesian network classifiers
    Cheng, J
    Greiner, R
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 101 - 108
  • [5] A Bayesian method for comparing and combining binary classifiers in the absence of a gold standard
    Keith, Jonathan M.
    Davey, Christian M.
    Boyd, Sarah E.
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13
  • [6] A Bayesian method for comparing and combining binary classifiers in the absence of a gold standard
    Jonathan M Keith
    Christian M Davey
    Sarah E Boyd
    [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 13
  • [7] Implications of the Dirichlet assumption for discretization of continuous variables in naive Bayesian classifiers
    Hsu, CN
    Huang, HJ
    Wong, TT
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2003, 53 (03) : 235 - 263
  • [8] Implications of the Dirichlet Assumption for Discretization of Continuous Variables in Naive Bayesian Classifiers
    Chun-Nan Hsu
    Hung-Ju Huang
    Tzu-Tsung Wong
    [J]. Machine Learning, 2003, 53 : 235 - 263
  • [9] Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertain
    Adams, NM
    Hand, DJ
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (07) : 1139 - 1147
  • [10] Comparing a Bayesian Classifier for Acoustic Signals to Machine Learning Classifiers
    Bragdon, Sophia P.
    Wilson, D. Keith
    Pettit, Chris L.
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR/INFORMATION FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXXII, 2023, 12547