Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase

被引:55
|
作者
Sciacovelli, Laura [1 ]
Aita, Ada [1 ]
Padoan, Andrea [1 ]
Pelloso, Michela [1 ]
Antonelli, Giorgia [1 ]
Piva, Elisa [1 ]
Chiozza, Maria Laura [2 ]
Plebani, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Padua, Dept Lab Med, Via Giustiniani 2, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Padua, Dept Qual & Accreditat, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
performance criteria; post-analytical phase; quality indicators; PATHOLOGISTS Q-PROBES; LABORATORY MEDICINE; TURNAROUND TIME; ERRORS; STAT; SPECIFICATIONS;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2015-0897
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Quality indicators (QIs) used as performance measurements are an effective tool in accurately estimating quality, identifying problems that may need to be addressed, and monitoring the processes over time. In Laboratory Medicine, QIs should cover all steps of the testing process, as error studies have confirmed that most errors occur in the pre- and post-analytical phase of testing. Aim of the present study is to provide preliminary results on QIs and related performance criteria in the post-analytical phase. Methods: This work was conducted according to a previously described study design based on the voluntary -participation of clinical laboratories in the project on QIs of the Working Group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" (WG-LEPS) of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Results: Overall, data collected highlighted an improvement or stability in performances over time for all reported indicators thus demonstrating that the use of QIs is-effective in the quality improvement strategy. Moreover, QIs data are an important source for defining the state-of- the-art concerning the error rate in the total testing process. The definition of performance specifications based on the state-of-the-art, as suggested by consensus documents, is a valuable benchmark point in evaluating the performance of each laboratory. Conclusions: Laboratory tests play a relevant role in the monitoring and evaluation of the efficacy of patient outcome thus assisting clinicians in decision-making. Laboratory performance evaluation is therefore crucial to providing patients with safe, effective and efficient care.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1176
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance criteria of the post-analytical phase
    Sikaris, Kenneth
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (06) : 949 - 958
  • [2] Improving the post-analytical phase
    Plebani, Mario
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 48 (04) : 435 - 436
  • [3] IDENTIFICATION AND MEASURING OF PRE AND POST-ANALYTICAL QUALITY INDICATORS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE
    Galli, J. C.
    Piccolo, M. L.
    Ghisolfi, C. M.
    Sebastian, S. L.
    Goni, M. C.
    Scilingo, V.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 : S721 - S721
  • [4] EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN THE POST-ANALYTICAL PHASE IN CROATIA
    Paro, M. M. Kardum
    Juretic, D.
    Nazor, A.
    Perkov, S.
    Sikirica, M.
    Lovrencic, M. Vucic
    Duric, K.
    Flegar-Mestric, Z.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 : S725 - S725
  • [5] Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase
    Plebani, Mario
    Sciacovelli, Laura
    Aita, Ada
    Pelloso, Michela
    Chiozza, Maria Laura
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (06) : 943 - 948
  • [6] Quality in post-analytical phase: Indirect reference intervals for erythrocyte parameters of neonates
    Grecu, Daniela Stefania
    Paulescu, Eugenia
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 46 (7-8) : 617 - 621
  • [7] IS THERE A POST-ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY
    LAUGIER, S
    [J]. ESPRIT, 1995, (10): : 16 - 35
  • [8] Post-Analytical Phase Detection of Identification Errors in Anatomic
    Smith, M. A.
    Weihagen, L. T.
    Ohori, N. P.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 506A - 507A
  • [10] Pre-analytical and post-analytical phase in therapeutic drug monitoring
    Taneli, F.
    [J]. FEBS JOURNAL, 2016, 283 : 102 - 102