Validity of the Morse Fall Scale and the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for fall risk assessment in an acute care setting

被引:20
|
作者
Kim, Young Ju [1 ]
Choi, Kyoung-Ok [1 ]
Cho, Suk Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Seok Jung [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijenongbu St Marys Hosp, Dept Nursing, Uijenongbu, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Review & Assessment Comm, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
accidental falls; fall risk assessment; Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment tool; Morse Fall Scale; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16185
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and Objectives To evaluate the measured fall risk score that more accurately reflects the changeable conditions in acute care settings, and to efficiently evaluate the association between falls and fall risk score. Background The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is a well-known easy-to-use tool, while the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) consists of items with high specificity. Evaluating suitable fall-risk assessment tools to measure these changeable conditions may contribute to preventing falls in acute care settings. Design Retrospective case-control study using the STROBE checklist. Methods In an acute care setting (708-bedded university hospital with a regional emergency medical centre), the non-fall group was adjusted to fall group using propensity score matching. According to the fall rate of 3-5%, non-fall groups for each tool were selected (1386 and 1947) from the before adjusted data, and the fall groups included 42 and 59. The applied covariates were individual characteristics that ordinarily changed such as age, gender, diagnostic department and hospitalisation period. The adjusted data were analysed using generalised estimating equations and mixed effect model. Results After adjustment, the fall group measured using the JHFRAT had a significantly higher difference between the initial and re-measured total score than the non-fall group. The JHFRAT, especially with the re-measured score, had a higher AUC value for predicting falls than the MFS. MFS's sensitivity was 85.7%, and specificity was 58.8% at 50 points; for JHFRAT, these were 67.8% and 80.2% at 14 points, respectively. These cut-off points were used to evaluate validity during tool development and are commonly used as reference scores. Conclusions JHFRAT more accurately reflects acute changeable conditions related to fall risk measurements after admission. Relevance to clinical practice JHFRAT may be useful for effective fall prevention activities in acute care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:3584 / 3594
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool: A Study of Reliability and Validity
    Poe, Stephanie S.
    Dawson, Patricia B.
    Cvach, Maria
    Burnett, Margaret
    Kumble, Sowmya
    Lewis, Maureen
    Thompson, Carol B.
    Hill, Elizabeth E.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2018, 33 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [2] The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool - Postimplementation evaluation
    Poe, Stephanie S.
    Cvach, Maria
    Dawson, Patricia B.
    Straus, Harriet
    Hil, Elizabeth E.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2007, 22 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [3] Transcultural adaptation of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool
    Martinez, Maria Carmen
    Iwamoto, Viviane Ernesto
    Dias de Oliveira Latorre, Maria do Rosario
    Noronha, Adriana Moreira
    de Sousa Oliveira, Ana Paula
    Alves Cardoso, Carlos Eduardo
    Braga Marques, Ifigenia Augusta
    Vendramim, Patricia
    Lopes, Paula Cristina
    Saes de Sant'Ana, Thais Helena
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2016, 24
  • [4] Predictive Validity of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for Older Patients in Stroke Rehabilitation
    Hong, Seungho
    Kim, Ji-Sook
    Choi, Young-Ah
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [5] Validity of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Falls on Inpatient Medicine Services
    Klinkenberg, W. Dean
    Potter, Patricia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2017, 32 (02) : 108 - 113
  • [6] Longitudinal Evaluation of Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool and Nurses' Experience
    Hur, Eun Young
    Jin, Yinji
    Jin, Taixian
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2017, 32 (03) : 242 - 251
  • [7] Assessment of the predictive ability of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) in inpatient settings
    Chen, Yadan
    Lv, Limin
    Wu, Chunni
    Wen, Huan
    Cai, Hongxia
    Xiao, Yujuan
    Zhu, Haihua
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 (12) : 4054 - 4061
  • [8] External validation of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool in older Dutch hospitalized patients
    Birgit A. Damoiseaux-Volman
    Natasja M. van Schoor
    Stephanie Medlock
    Johannes A. Romijn
    Nathalie van der Velde
    Ameen Abu-Hanna
    European Geriatric Medicine, 2023, 14 : 69 - 77
  • [9] External validation of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool in older Dutch hospitalized patients
    Damoiseaux-Volman, Birgit A.
    van Schoor, Natasja M.
    Medlock, Stephanie
    Romijn, Johannes A.
    van der Velde, Nathalie
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2023, 14 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [10] Fall risk assessment tool
    MacAvoy, S
    Skinner, T
    Hines, M
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1996, 9 (04) : 213 - 218