Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden

被引:11
|
作者
Criss, Steven D. [1 ]
Palazzo, Lauren [1 ]
Watson, Tina R. [1 ]
Paquette, Adelle M. [1 ]
Sigel, Keith [2 ]
Wisnivesky, Juan [2 ,3 ]
Kong, Chung Yin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Gen Internal Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEALTH; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0228288
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives While previous cost-effectiveness studies on pembrolizumab in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have found these regimens to be cost-effective, their reliance on randomized controlled trial (RCT) data with strict inclusion criteria limits generalizability to patients with comorbidities. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with various comorbidities. Materials and methods In our base case analysis, we studied pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembrolizumab combination therapy) versus chemotherapy alone. In a secondary analysis, we considered only patients with PD-L1 expression of at least 50% (PD-L1-high) and evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab combination therapy, and chemotherapy alone. Microsimulation models were developed for the base case and the PD-L1-high analyses. To estimate outcomes of patients with differing comorbidities, we combined survival data from patients with few or no comorbidities from the RCTs with estimates from the general population obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Comorbidity burden level was divided into three groups based on the Charlson score (equal to 0, 1, or 2+); patients with various other specific comorbidities were also analyzed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results In the Charlson 0, Charlson 1, and Charlson 2+ patient populations, estimated ICERs for pembrolizumab combination therapy in the base case model were $173,919/QALY, $175,165/QALY, and $181,777/QALY, respectively, compared to chemotherapy. In the PD-L1-high model, the Charlson 0, Charlson 1, and Charlson 2+ patients had ICERs of $147,406/QALY, $149,026/QALY, and $154,521/QALY with pembrolizumab combination therapy versus chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was weakly dominated for each comorbidity group in the PD-L1-high model. Conclusion For patients with stage IV NSCLC and varying comorbidity burden, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab does not represent a cost-effective strategy compared to chemotherapy. Resources should be focused on collecting immunotherapy survival data for more representative NSCLC patient populations.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Pembrolizumab Regimens for the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Nan Qiao
    Ralph Insinga
    Gilberto de Lima Lopes Junior
    John Cook
    Martin Sénécal
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2021, 5 : 365 - 383
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Georgieva, M.
    Aguiar, P., Jr.
    Lima, J. P.
    Haaland, B.
    Lopes, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S2148 - S2149
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Georgieva, Mina
    da Silveira Nogueira Lima, Joao P.
    Aguiar, Pedro
    Lopes, Gilberto de Lima, Jr.
    Haaland, Benjamin
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2018, 124 : 248 - 254
  • [4] A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Pembrolizumab Regimens for the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Qiao, Nan
    Insinga, Ralph
    Lopes Junior, Gilberto de Lima
    Cook, John
    Senecal, Martin
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2021, 5 (03) : 365 - 383
  • [5] A REVIEW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES OF PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Qiao, N.
    Insinga, R.
    Burke, T.
    Lopes, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S41 - S42
  • [6] Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Profile of Second-Line Treatments with Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Franchi, Matteo
    Pellegrini, Giacomo
    Corrao, Giovanni
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICALS, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Aziz, Mohamed Ismail Abdul
    Tan, Ling Eng
    Tan, Wan Hui Gloria
    Toh, Chee-Keong
    Loke, Lydia Pui Yee
    Pearce, Fiona
    Ng, Kwong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (09) : 952 - 960
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NIVOLUMAB COMPARED TO PEMBROLIZUMAB IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS
    Huang, Y.
    Wang, Y.
    Diaby, K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S414 - S414
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Pavlakis, N
    Mitchell, PL
    Slynes, G
    Aristides, M
    Davey, P
    Rajan, N
    Arora, B
    Liepa, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 549S - 549S
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
    Kunde, Katharina
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 150 - 151