In- and ex-vessel coupled analysis of IVR-ERVC phenomenon for large scale PWR

被引:38
|
作者
Jin, Yue [1 ]
Xu, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Xiaojing [1 ]
Cheng, Xu [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Nucl Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Fus & Reactor Technol, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Severe accident; Transient analysis; Core degradation; Molten pool formation; IVR-ERVC; Large scale PWR; RETENTION; AP1000;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2015.01.041
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
As a key severe accident management strategy for light water reactors (LVVRs), in-vessel retention (IVR) through external reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) has been the focus of relevant studies for decades. However, previous studies only investigated the molten pool configurations considered to be in a final steady state mainly for reactors of such as AP600 and AP1000. Furthermore, most of studies performed in the past dealt with analysis for an isolated IVR-ERVC process, without considering the strong coupling between the internal and external reactor pressure vessel (RPV) conditions. This paper addresses the IVR-ERVC issues from a transient perspective using the severe accident code MELCOR for a large advanced passive power plant: a three-loop, 5000 MWt scale pressurized water reactor with passive safety features. The analysis is mainly focused on the severe accident transients including core degradation and relocation, molten pool formation and growth, and heat transfer within a molten pool. Furthermore, internal and external RPV conditions are combined together in the IVR-ERVC analysis. MELCOR calculations for lower head heat flux are then compared with critical heat flux (CHF) to assess the effectiveness of IVR-ERVC. The results suggest that lower head heat flux is below the CHF value. Therefore, the IVRERVC strategy for this large PWR is considered to be feasible. It was also found that as the reactor power is raised to large scale PVVR, new accident sequences may occur during the severe accident evolution, thus leading to a proposal of a completely new molten pool configuration for future studies. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 337
页数:16
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] In- and ex-vessel coupled analysis for in-vessel retention
    Luo, Yuejian
    Liu, Xiaojing
    Cheng, Xu
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2018, 109 : 74 - 82
  • [2] IVR-ERVC study of 1700 MW class PWR based on MAAP simulation and coupled analysis
    Luo, Yuejian
    Liu, Xiaojing
    Cheng, Xu
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 126 : 1 - 9
  • [3] Analysis of PWR ex-vessel steam explosion for axial and side melt release
    Leskovar, Matjaz
    Ursic, Mitja
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 283 : 40 - 50
  • [4] Numerical analysis of pressure load in a PWR cavity in an ex-vessel steam explosion
    钟明君
    李志刚
    林萌
    黄熙
    周源
    杨燕华
    NuclearScienceandTechniques, 2014, 25 (03) : 67 - 77
  • [5] Numerical analysis of pressure load in a PWR cavity in an ex-vessel steam explosion
    Zhong Ming-Jun
    Li Zhi-Gang
    Lin Meng
    Huang Xi
    Zhou Yuan
    Yang Yan-Hua
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2014, 25 (03)
  • [6] Large-scale experiments on ex-vessel core melt behavior
    Sappok, M
    Steinwarz, W
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 125 (03) : 363 - 370
  • [7] Large-scale experiments on ex-vessel core melt behaviour
    Sappok, M
    Steinwarz, W
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TOPICAL MEETING ON ADVANCED REACTORS SAFETY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 127 - 134
  • [8] Coupled MELCOR/COCOMO analysis on quench of ex-vessel debris beds
    Chen, Yangli
    Zhang, Huimin
    Ma, Weimin
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 165
  • [9] Analysis of a Large-Scale PWR In-Vessel Retention Device
    Tsai, Fei-Jan
    Lee, Min
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 205 (04) : 524 - 541
  • [10] The plant-specific uncertainty analysis for an ex-vessel steam explosion-induced pressure load using a TEXAS-SAUNA coupled system
    Ahn, Kwang-Il
    Park, Sun-Hee
    Kim, Hee-Dong
    Park, Hyun Sun
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2012, 249 : 400 - 412