Social Learning and Natural Resource Management: The Emergence of Three Research Perspectives

被引:104
|
作者
Rodela, Romina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2011年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
bibliography; natural resource management; social learning; sustainability; systematic review; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATION; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEMS; RISK;
D O I
10.5751/ES-04554-160430
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A review is presented of research contributions that use social learning in research on natural resource management. The review is based on an extensive survey of peer-reviewed journal articles appraised against the following selected analytical items: (1) characterizing features, (2) level of analysis, and (3) operational measures. Together, these allowed for an assessment of underlying assumptions and emerging themes. The findings suggest that, within natural resource management literature, three research approaches to social learning have been developed, each with its own assumptions about the learning process, learning outcomes, and operational practices. Hence, we find that a group of publications showed an interest for participants' learning experiences and focused on the type of outcomes that arise from their attendance in participatory workshops and similar activities. Also, findings indicate that a second group of publications showing an interest for learning in other types of settings, such as groups, networks, and associations, have framed social learning as a process that results in a change in resource management practices, or in how things are done. On the other hand, a third group of publications showed an interest in social-ecological systems emphasizing learning as an emergent property.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management
    Rodela, Romina
    Cundill, Georgina
    Wals, Arjen E. J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 77 : 16 - 26
  • [2] Social learning for collaborative natural resource management
    Schusler, TM
    Decker, DJ
    Pfeffer, MJ
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2003, 16 (04) : 309 - 326
  • [3] Social capital and social learning in the process of natural resource management
    Pretty, J
    Buck, L
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN AFRICAN AGRICULTURE: UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING CURRENT PRACTICES, 2002, : 23 - 33
  • [4] Measuring Social Learning in Participatory Approaches to Natural Resource Management
    van der Wal, Merel
    De Kraker, Joop
    Offermans, Astrid
    Kroeze, Carolien
    Kirschner, Paul A.
    van Ittersum, Martin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2014, 24 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [5] A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management
    Cundill, G.
    Rodela, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 113 : 7 - 14
  • [6] Social and Gender Analysis in Natural Resource Management: Learning Studies from Asia
    Kume, Yuko
    [J]. GENDER TECHNOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 10 (03): : 393 - 394
  • [7] Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management
    Groce, Julie E.
    Farrelly, Megan A.
    Jorgensen, Bradley S.
    Cook, Carly N.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 53 - 65
  • [8] What is the problem? Usefulness, the cultural turn, and social research for natural resource management
    Gill, N
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2006, 37 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [9] Demonstrating the value of a social science research program to a natural resource management agency
    Jakes, PJ
    Dwyer, JF
    Carr, DS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 NORTHEASTERN RECREATION RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM, 1997, 241 : 228 - 233
  • [10] Social assessment in natural resource management institutions
    Kingma, O
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 46 (04) : 637 - 639