Bioenergy from mountain forest: a life cycle assessment of the Norwegian woody biomass supply chain

被引:24
|
作者
Valente, Clara [1 ,2 ]
Hillring, Bengt Gunnar [1 ]
Solberg, Birger [2 ]
机构
[1] Hedmark Univ Coll, Fac Appl Ecol & Agr Sci, NO-2480 Koppang, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, NO-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Forest system; greenhouse gas emissions; life cycle assessment; mountainous areas; Norway; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; OPERATIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACTS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1080/02827581.2011.570783
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Norwegian mountain forests represent interesting sources of wood biomass for bioenergy. This case study gives a life cycle assessment of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs of forest management, harvest and transport operations in the mountainous areas of Hedmark and Oppland counties in Norway. Low-intensity forest management characterizes the study sites. The study shows that transportation to the terminal is the operation with the highest GHG impacts in the examined supply chain and that the bundling of forest residues has the highest financial cost. The mountain forest system analyzed emits 17,600 g CO(2)e per solid cubic meter over bark. Transportation to the terminal accounts for 31% of the emissions and 23% of the costs, while bundling accounts for 25% of the total emissions and 19% of the total costs. The study shows that there is a considerable quantity of woody biomass available for bioenergy purpose from mountain areas. In the short term, it is possible to integrate harvesting of logging residues in the conventional logging operations. However, it is necessary to improve forest management, logistic and technology for reducing emissions and operative costs, ensuring the achievement of a sustainable system at the same time.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ACTIVATED CARBON FROM WOODY BIOMASS
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard
    Anderson, Nathaniel
    Alanya-Rosenbaum, Sevda
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2018, 50 (03): : 229 - 243
  • [2] Bioenergy from woody biomass
    Saka, S
    MOKUZAI GAKKAISHI, 2005, 51 (01): : 58 - 59
  • [3] Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners' willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy
    Joshi, Omkar
    Mehmood, Sayeed R.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (01): : 186 - 192
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Optimization of Regional Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chains
    Cucek, Lidija
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Varbanov, Petar Sabev
    Kravanja, Zdravko
    PRES 2011: 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 25 : 575 - +
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from orchards woody residues in Northern Italy
    Boschiero, Martina
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Nati, Carla
    Zerbe, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2569 - 2580
  • [6] Forest Supply Chain for Bioenergy: An Approach for Biomass Study in the Framework of a Circular Bioeconomy
    Manrique, Silvina M.
    Subelza, Carolina R.
    Antonia Toro, Maria
    Quintero Bertel, Quelbis R.
    Tauro, Raul J.
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (20)
  • [7] Forest Biomass Policy in Minnesota: Supply Chain Perspectives on Barriers to Bioenergy Development
    Carleton, Laura Eaton
    Becker, Dennis
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (05)
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of forest-based biomass for bioenergy: A case study in British Columbia, Canada
    Maier, Jan Moritz
    Sowlati, Taraneh
    Salazar, James
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 146 : 598 - 609
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of woody biomass ash for soil amelioration
    da Costa, Tamiris Pacheco
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Tarelho, Luis A. C.
    Arroja, Luis
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 101 : 126 - 140
  • [10] Availability and utilization costs of forest woody biomass for bioenergy in Mexico
    Flores, Ulises
    Jaeger, Dirk
    FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: CHALLENGES FOR FOREST ENGINEERING, 2016, : 297 - 297