Assessing educational priorities in genetics for general practitioners and specialists in five countries: factor structure of the Genetic-Educational Priorities (Gen-EP) scale

被引:0
|
作者
Calefato, Jean-Marc [1 ]
Nippert, Irma [2 ]
Harris, Hilary J. [3 ]
Kristoffersson, Ulf [4 ]
Schmidtke, Jorg [5 ]
Ten Kate, Leo P. [6 ]
Anionwu, Elizabeth [7 ]
Benjamin, Caroline [3 ]
Challen, Kirsty [3 ]
Plass, Anne-Marie [6 ]
Harris, Rodney [3 ]
Julian-Reynier, Claire [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille 1, INSERM, UMR912, Marseille, France
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Humangenet, Frauengesund heitsforschung, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Manchester, GenEd Coordinating Ctr, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, Lund, Sweden
[5] Med Hochschule Hannover, Inst Humangenet, Hannover, Germany
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst, Dept Clin Genet & Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Thames Valley Univ, Fac Hlth & Human Sci, London, England
[8] Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, F-13009 Marseille, France
[9] Univ Aix Marseille 1, Marseille, France
关键词
genetics; continuing education; factor analysis; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/GIM.Ob013e3181614271
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: A scale assessing primary care physicians' priorities for genetic education (The Gen-EP scale) was developed and tested in five European countries. The objective of this study was to determine its factor structure, to test scaling assumptions and to determine internal consistency. Methods: The sample consisted of 3686 practitioners (general practitioners, gyneco-obstetricians, pediatricians) sampled in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and United Kingdom. We first determined the factor structure of the Gen-EP scale (30 items) on the whole sample. Scaling assumptions were then tested on each country using multitrait scaling analysis. Internal consistency was assessed across the five countries. Results: Six factors were identified accounting for 63.3% of the variance of the items. They represented the following priorities for genetic education: "Genetics of Common Diseases"; "Ethical, Legal, and Public Health Issues"; "Approaching Genetic Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice"; "Basic Genetics and Congenital Malformations"; "Techniques and Innovation in Genetics" and "Psychosocial and Counseling Issues." In each country, convergent and discriminant validity were satisfactory. Internal-consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) were all above the acceptable threshold (0.70). Conclusion: The Gen-EP scale could be a helpful instrument in different countries to organize and evaluate the impact of genetic educational programs for primary care providers.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Genetics in clinical practice: general practitioners' educational priorities in European countries
    Julian-Reynier, Claire
    Nippert, Irma
    Calefato, Jean-Marc
    Harris, Hilary
    Kristoffersson, Ulf
    Schmidtke, Joerg
    Ten Kate, Leo
    Anionwu, Elizabeth
    Benjamin, Caroline
    Challen, Kirsty
    Plass, Anne-Marie
    Harris, Rodney
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [2] Genetics in clinical practice: general practitioners' educational priorities in European countries (vol 10, pg 107, 2008)
    Julian-Reynier, C.
    Nippert, I
    Calefato, J-M
    Harris, H.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (03) : 228 - 228