Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements

被引:4
|
作者
Crnosija, Natalie [1 ]
Zamora, Misti Levy [2 ,3 ]
Rule, Ana M. [3 ]
Payne-Sturges, Devon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Maryland Inst Appl Environm Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, 255 Valley Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, UConn Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth Environm Hlth & Engn, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
air pollution; low-cost sensors; particulate matter; EXPOSURE; POLLUTION; VARIABILITY; OUTDOOR; INDOOR;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19127340
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The emergence of low-cost air quality sensors as viable tools for the monitoring of air quality at population and individual levels necessitates the evaluation of these instruments. The Flow air quality tracker, a product of Plume Labs, is one such sensor. To evaluate these sensors, we assessed 34 of them in a controlled laboratory setting by exposing them to PM10 and PM2.5 and compared the response with Plantower A003 measurements. The overall coefficient of determination (R-2) of measured PM2.5 was 0.76 and of PM10 it was 0.73, but the Flows' accuracy improved after each introduction of incense. Overall, these findings suggest that the Flow can be a useful air quality monitoring tool in air pollution areas with higher concentrations, when incorporated into other monitoring frameworks and when used in aggregate. The broader environmental implications of this work are that it is possible for individuals and groups to monitor their individual exposure to particulate matter pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Traceability Issue in PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements
    Aggarwal, S. G.
    Kumar, S.
    Mandal, P.
    Sarangi, B.
    Singh, K.
    Pokhariyal, J.
    Mishra, S. K.
    Agarwal, S.
    Sinha, D.
    Singh, S.
    Sharma, C.
    Gupta, P. K.
    MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2013, 28 (03): : 153 - 166
  • [2] Traceability Issue in PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements
    Shankar G. Aggarwal
    Sudhanshu Kumar
    Papiya Mandal
    Bighnaraj Sarangi
    Khem Singh
    Jyoti Pokhariyal
    Sumit K. Mishra
    Smita Agarwal
    Deepak Sinha
    Sukhvir Singh
    Chhemendra Sharma
    Prabhat K. Gupta
    MAPAN, 2013, 28 : 153 - 166
  • [3] PM10 and PM2.5 aerosol fractions in Zagreb air
    Šega, K.
    Hršak, J.
    Ačkovi, M.
    Bešli, I.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 2000, 31 (SUPPL. 1)
  • [4] Emission measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 at industrial plants
    Geueke, KJ
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2005, 65 (7-8): : 313 - 316
  • [5] Assessment of ambient air PM10 and PM2.5 and characterization of PM10 in the city of Kanpur, India
    Sharma, M
    Maloo, S
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (33) : 6015 - 6026
  • [6] Sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in Cairo's ambient air
    Abu-Allaban, M.
    Lowenthal, D. H.
    Gertler, A. W.
    Labib, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, 133 (1-3) : 417 - 425
  • [7] The Effect of Meteorological Conditions on PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution of the Air
    Radzka, Elzbieta
    Rymuza, Katarzyna
    ROCZNIK OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2019, 21 (01): : 611 - 628
  • [8] Sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in Cairo’s ambient air
    M. Abu-Allaban
    D. H. Lowenthal
    A. W. Gertler
    M. Labib
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 133 : 417 - 425
  • [9] Measurements of PM10 and PM2.5 particle concentrations in Athens, Greece
    Chaloulakou, A
    Kassomenos, P
    Spyrellis, N
    Demokritou, P
    Koutrakis, P
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (05) : 649 - 660
  • [10] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    Williams, R
    Suggs, J
    Rodes, C
    Lawless, P
    Zweidinger, R
    Kwok, R
    Creason, J
    Sheldon, L
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05): : 497 - 505