No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study

被引:8
|
作者
Coleshill, Matthew James [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sharpe, Louise [1 ]
Colagiuri, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, UNSW Med, St Vincents Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Nocebo effect; Nocebo hyperalgesia; Attentional bias; Anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; THREAT-EXPECTANCY; PLACEBO; TRIALS; FEAR; INFORMATION; VIGILANCE; PARADIGM; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1097/PR9.0000000000000921
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Placebo and nocebo effects in pain are well documented. One leading explanation is that instructions indicating that pain will either increase or decrease after receipt of a treatment give rise to expectations for increased or decreased pain. However, the psychological mechanisms through which expectations affect pain perception are not well understood. One possibility is that the expectation of increased pain leads to anticipatory anxiety, which in turn increases attention towards painful sensations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that attention mediates nocebo hyperalgesia. This was done by measuring attentional bias towards pain using a dot-probe task both before and after a nocebo manipulation. Methods: Ninety-six healthy volunteers were randomized to receive one of the following: (1) an inert nasal spray with placebo instructions, (2) an inert nasal spray with nocebo instructions, or (3) no treatment. Participants completed measures of expectations, anxiety, and attention bias (dot-probe paradigm) both before and after randomization. Results: Results showed that the nocebo instructions induced expectations for increased pain and resulted in nocebo hyperalgesia. Conversely, the placebo instruction failed to induce expectations for decreases in pain and did not demonstrate any placebo analgesia. Furthermore, despite the significant expectancies for pain and subsequent nocebo hyperalgesia, there were no differences between the nocebo group and either the placebo or no-treatment group for anxiety or attentional bias. Conclusion: The results are consistent with the expectancy model of placebo and nocebo effects. That is, changes in expectations seemed to be necessary to induce a placebo or nocebo effect. However, there was no evidence that anxiety or attention bias towards pain-related stimuli was necessary to achieve nocebo hyperalgesia.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis of dot-probe studies
    Todd, Jemma
    van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M. L.
    Sharpe, Louise
    Crombez, Geert
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 12 (04) : 419 - 436
  • [2] Neural correlates of the attentional bias towards pain-related faces in fibromyalgia patients: An ERP study using a dot-probe task
    Fernandes-Magalhaes, Roberto
    Ferrera, David
    Pelaez, Irene
    Martin-Buro, Maria Carmen
    Carpio, Alberto
    Eugenia De Lahoz, Maria
    Barjola, Paloma
    Mercado, Francisco
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2022, 166
  • [3] The Psychometric Properties of the Dot-Probe Paradigm When Used in Pain-Related Attentional Bias Research
    Dear, Blake F.
    Sharpe, Louise
    Nicholas, Michael K.
    Refshauge, Kathryn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 12 (12): : 1247 - 1254
  • [4] Pain-related fear as a facilitator of nocebo hyperalgesia: an experimental study
    Thomaidou, Mia A.
    Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S.
    Meulders, Ann
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S104 - S105
  • [5] Attentional bias towards cocaine cues using a dot-probe detection task
    Rubio, G.
    Chamorro, J.
    Moratti, S.
    Martinez-Gras, I.
    Campo, P.
    Ponce, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 20 : S584 - S584
  • [6] Attentional bias towards cocaine cues using a dot-probe detection task
    Castillo, C.
    Martinez, D.
    Martinez, R.
    Rossi, P.
    Fonseca, E.
    Astals, M.
    Mairal, G.
    Tort, L. L.
    Torrens, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 20 : S584 - S585
  • [7] Sleep-related attentional bias for tired faces in insomnia: Evidence from a dot-probe paradigm
    Akram, Umair
    Beattie, Louise
    Ypsilanti, Antonia
    Reidy, John
    Robson, Anna
    Chapman, Ashley J.
    Barclay, Nicola L.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2018, 103 : 18 - 23
  • [8] It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task
    Benedikt Emanuel Wirth
    Dirk Wentura
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 2463 - 2481
  • [9] It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task
    Wirth, Benedikt Emanuel
    Wentura, Dirk
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (05) : 2463 - 2481
  • [10] Attentional bias for asthma-cues in asthma: evidence from a dot-probe task
    De Peuter, S
    Swennen, C
    Verleden, G
    Demedts, M
    Van den Bergh, O
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 67 (03) : 417 - 417