A randomized investigator-blind parallel-group study to assess efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 15% gel vs. adapalene 0.1% gel in the treatment and maintenance treatment of female adult acne

被引:35
|
作者
Thielitz, A. [1 ]
Lux, A. [2 ]
Wiede, A. [1 ]
Kropf, S. [2 ]
Papakonstantinou, E. [1 ]
Gollnick, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Inst Biometry & Med Informat, Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
VULGARIS; ISOTRETINOIN; COMBINATION; PREVALENCE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.12823
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundGrowing numbers of post-adolescent females are suffering from treatment-resistant or relapsing adult acne forms, therefore requiring the definition of safe and effective treatment options for this burdening disease. ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy of azelaic acid 15% gel (AzA) vs. no treatment during maintenance therapy of female adult acne and to compare its efficacy and safety vs. adapalene 0.1% gel (AD) during a 9-month period (3-month treatment and 6-month maintenance treatment). MethodsA total of 55 women between 18 and 45years with adult acne were included in this investigator-blind trial and randomized into three groups receiving AzA gel b.i.d. for 9months (AzA9M, n=17) or AzA gel b.i.d. for 3months followed by a 6-month observational phase (AzA3M, n=19) or AD gel once daily for 9months (AD9M, n=19). Parameters of efficacy, safety and patient-related factors were analysed. ResultsThe reduction in lesion counts, severity and Dermatology Life Quality Index score was significant (P<0.05) and comparable between groups during the treatment phase, while dryness and scaling were significantly lower (P<0.05) in group AzA9M vs. AD9M. During maintenance, AzA9M was superior to AzA3M in the control of inflammatory lesions (P=0.008) and total lesions (P=0.014) at week 24. From week 12 to week 36, a mild relative increase in inflammatory lesions could be observed in all groups. In AzA3M, this increase exceeded that of AzA9M by 23.1% (P=0.109), while the difference of total lesions diverged to 30.8% (P=0.038). No significant differences could be detected between AzA9M and AD9M. Group AzA9M was non-inferior to AD9M (non-inferiority margin of 50% for the confidence limit for the relative effect) in the control of inflammatory acne lesions. ConclusionsAzA15% gel is a safe and effective treatment and maintenance treatment of female adult acne with non-inferior efficacy to AD 0.1% gel in the control of inflammatory acne.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 796
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of a Novel Rosacea Treatment System: An Investigator-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study
    Leyden, James J.
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 10 (10) : 1179 - 1185
  • [2] Adapalene gel, 0.1%, as maintenance therapy for acne vulgaris - A randomized, controlled, investigator-blind follow-up of a recent combination study
    Thiboutot, Diane M.
    Shalita, Alan R.
    Yamauchi, Paul S.
    Dawson, Catherine
    Kerrouche, Nabil
    Arsonnaud, Stephanie
    Kang, Sewon
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (05) : 597 - 602
  • [3] The efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.3% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded, controlled comparison study versus adapalene gel 0.1% and vehicle
    Pariser, DM
    Thiboutot, DM
    Clark, SD
    Jones, TM
    Liu, Y
    Graeber, M
    CUTIS, 2005, 76 (02): : 145 - 151
  • [4] Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel versus topical combination therapy of adapalene 0.1% gel and clindamycin phosphate 1.2% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind, parallel-group study
    Hayashi, Nobukazu
    Kurokawa, Ichiro
    Siakpere, Obukohwo
    Endo, Akira
    Hatanaka, Toshiki
    Yamada, Masahiro
    Kawashima, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 45 (08): : 951 - 962
  • [5] An investigator-blind, randomized study comparing a 3% erythromycin 5% benzoyl peroxide combination in gel versus 20% azelaic acid cream in the treatment of acne vulgaris
    Dunlap, FE
    Maloney, JM
    Levy, S
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1997, 108 (03) : 126 - 126
  • [6] Adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for the treatment of severe inflammatory acne: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled study
    Weiss, Jonathan S.
    Gold, Linda Stein
    Tanghetti, Emil A.
    Leoni, Matthew J.
    Liu, Hong
    Rueda, Maria Jose
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 74 (05) : AB1 - AB1
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of clindamycin gel plus either benzoyl peroxide gel or adapalene gel in the treatment of acne: a randomized open-label study
    Dudhia S.
    Shah R.B.
    Agrawal P.
    Shah A.
    Date S.
    Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 2015, 31 (6) : 208 - 212
  • [8] Dapsone gel 5% in combination with adapalene gel 0.1%, benzoyl peroxide get 4%, or vehicle gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, double-blind study
    Fleischer, Alan B., Jr.
    Draelos, Zoe D.
    Abramovits, William
    Pariser, David M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 56 (02) : AB16 - AB16
  • [9] Superior efficacy of azithromycin and levamisole vs. azithromycin in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris: an investigator-blind randomized clinical trial in 169 patients
    Rassai, Sima
    Mehri, Majid
    Yaghoobi, Reza
    Sina, Niloofar
    Mohebbipour, Alireza
    Feily, Amir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 51 (06) : 490 - 494
  • [10] Randomized Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene 0.1% Cream and Adapalene 0.3% Gel in the Treatment of Patients With at Least Moderate Facial Acne Vulgaris
    Tanghetti, Emil
    Dhawan, Sunil
    Green, Lawrence
    Del Rosso, James
    Draelos, Zoe
    Leyden, James
    Shalita, Alan
    Glaser, Dee Anna
    Grimes, Pearl
    Webster, Guy
    Barnett, Pamela
    Le Gall, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 9 (05) : 549 - 558