Supersizing the Penis Following Penile Prosthesis Implantation

被引:31
|
作者
Shaeer, Osama [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Kasr El Aini Fac Med, Dept Androl, Cairo, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2010年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
Penile Length; Augmentation; Elongation; Penis; Prosthesis; Implant; SATISFACTION PROFILES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; SURGERY; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01723.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. Following implantation of a penile prosthesis, some couples are dissatisfied with penile length, girth, shaft, or glans engorgement. This may be delusional because of the procedure per se or preexisting risk factors such as neglected priapism, Peyronie's disease, radical prostatectomy, or overhanging suprapubic fat. Aim. In this work, we try to enhance penile size in patients dissatisfied with its dimensions following implantation of a penile prosthesis, using various augmentation techniques. Methods. Eighteen patients who have had penile prostheses implanted were enrolled in this study based on dissatisfaction with penile size. The complaint was relieved by counseling and administration of PDE5 inhibitors in seven patients. Two patients had elongation, girth augmentation, and glans injection; six had elongation and girth augmentation; and two had elongation and glans injection. Main Outcome Measures. Penile size, satisfaction, and sexual function. Results. Average preoperative length and girth were 7.87 cm and 11.62 cm, respectively. Mean postoperative length and girth were 11.62 cm and 14.07 cm. The gain in length (47.6%) and girth (21%) were statistically significant (P < 0.005). All patients and partners were satisfied with the results following surgery except one who suffered graft loss. Conclusion. Implantation of a penile prosthesis may improve penile rigidity, yet may confound couple's satisfaction with penile size to variable degrees. Sex education may alleviate those concerns. In refractory cases, penile augmentation may enhance phallic size and increase patient/partner satisfaction. Shaeer O. Supersizing the penis following penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med 2010;7:2608-2616.
引用
收藏
页码:2608 / 2616
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SUPERSIZING THE PENIS FOLLOWING PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION
    Shaeer, O.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 : 180 - 181
  • [2] SHAEER'S DORSAL PHALLOPLASTY: SUPERSIZING THE PENIS UPON PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION
    Shaeer, O.
    Shaeer, K.
    Fathy, I
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (01): : S20 - S20
  • [3] Penile prosthesis implantation following prostatectomy
    Alei, G
    Letizia, P
    Viola, M
    Avenia, F
    ANDROLOGY 1996 - TWENTY YEARS LATER: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE SOCIETY OF ANDROLOGY, 1996, : 403 - 411
  • [4] Short penis syndrome following penile prosthesis surgery
    Sedigh, O.
    Paradiso, M.
    Liberale, F.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 : 67 - 67
  • [5] DORSAL PHALLOPLASTY FOR PRESERVATION OF THE LENGTH OF THE PENIS UPON PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION
    Shaeer, O.
    Raheem, Abdel A.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (04): : E141 - E141
  • [6] DORSAL PHALLOPLASTY: REVEALING THE CONCEALED PENIS ALONG WITH PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION
    Shaeer, Kamal O.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (07): : S322 - S322
  • [7] TOTAL PENILE DORSAL CURVATURE FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    DOW, JA
    MCCARTHY, LJ
    KIM, JH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04): : A307 - A307
  • [8] Gangrene of the distal penis after implantation of malleable penile prosthesis in a diabetic patient
    Asif Yildirim
    Erem Kaan Basok
    Adnan Basaran
    Resit Tokuc
    Advances in Therapy, 2008, 25 : 143 - 147
  • [9] Gangrene of the distal penis after implantation of malleable penile prosthesis in a diabetic patient
    Yildirim, Asif
    Basok, Erem Kaan
    Basaran, Adnan
    Tokuc, Resit
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2008, 25 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [10] Penile prosthesis implantation
    Montague, DK
    Angermeier, KW
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (02) : 355 - +