5-year results of dose-intensive sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for women with high-risk node-positive breast cancer: A phase II study

被引:42
|
作者
Hudis, C
Fornier, M
Riccio, L
Lebwohl, D
Crown, J
Gilewski, T
Surbone, A
Currie, V
Seidman, A
Reichman, B
Moynahan, M
Raptis, G
Sklarin, N
Theodoulou, M
Weiselberg, L
Salvaggio, R
Panageas, KS
Yao, TJ
Norton, L
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Div Solid Tumor Oncol, Breast Canc Med Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Cornell Univ Med Coll, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[4] N Shore Univ Hosp, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1118
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We conducted a phase II pilot study of dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin followed sequentially by high-dose cyclophosphamide to determine the safety and feasibility of this dose-dense treatment and to estimate the disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes. patients and Methods: Seventy-three patients received adjuvant treatment with four cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus every 21 days, followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m(2) every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Results: Seventy one patients were assessable, and all but two completed all planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most common toxicity was neutropenic fever, which occurred in 39% of patients. Median disease-free survival is 66 months (95% confidence interval, 34 to 98 months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. At 5 years of follow-up, the disease-free survival is 51.7%, and over-all survival is 60.0%. There is no long-term treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed. Conclusion: Our pilot study of doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the sequential dose dense plan. Long-term follow-up, although noncomparative, is promising. However, this regimen is associated with a higher incidence of toxicity (and also higher costs) than the standard dose and schedule of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and therefore it should not be used as conventional therapy in the absence of demonstrated improvement of outcome. Randomized trials testing the dose dense approach have been completed but not yet reported. Because the sequential plan can decrease overlapping toxicities, it is an appropriate platform for the addition of newer active agents, such as taxanes or monoclonal antibodies. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1126
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-risk Node-positive Breast Cancer: a Tale of Three Generations
    Ngan, R. K. C.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 14 (04): : S46 - S55
  • [2] Doxorubicin followed by sequential paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide:: 5-year results of a phase II randomized trial of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for women with node-positive breast carcinoma
    Fornier, MN
    Seidman, AD
    Theodoulou, M
    Moynahan, ME
    Currie, V
    Moasser, M
    Sklarin, N
    Gilewski, T
    D'Andrea, G
    Salvaggio, R
    Panageas, KS
    Norton, L
    Hudis, C
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 7 (12) : 3934 - 3941
  • [3] ADJUVANT PROGRAMS FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH NODE-POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER - PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF 5-YEAR RESULTS
    ROSSI, A
    BRAMBILLA, C
    VALAGUSSA, P
    BONADONNA, G
    RECENT RESULTS IN CANCER RESEARCH, 1984, 96 : 178 - 183
  • [4] Multicycle dose-intensive chemotherapy for women with high-risk primary breast cancer: Results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95
    Basset, RL
    O'Neill, A
    Martinelli, G
    Green, MD
    Peccatori, F
    Cinieri, S
    Coates, AS
    Gelber, RD
    Aebi, S
    Castighone-Gertsch, M
    Viale, G
    Price, KN
    Goldhirsch, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (03) : 370 - 378
  • [5] Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer
    Ragaz, J
    Jackson, SM
    Le, N
    Plenderleith, IH
    Spinelli, JJ
    Basco, VE
    Wilson, KS
    Knowling, MA
    Coppin, CML
    Paradis, M
    Coldman, AJ
    Olivotto, IA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (14): : 956 - 962
  • [6] Adjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of mitoxantrone, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: Phase II pilot study
    Kanno, M
    Nakamura, S
    Uotani, C
    Taniya, T
    Mura, T
    Bando, H
    Kawahara, F
    Tsugawa, K
    Noguchi, M
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 11 (05) : 396 - 401
  • [7] A phase II feasibility trial of dose-dense docetaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer
    Yardley, Denise A.
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Farley, Cindy P.
    Barton, John H.
    Peacock, Nancy W.
    Spigel, David R.
    Greco, F. Anthony
    Hainsworth, John D.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2008, 8 (03) : 242 - 248
  • [8] Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive operable breast cancer in older women
    Du, XLL
    Jones, DV
    Zhang, D
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 60 (09): : 1137 - 1144
  • [9] Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer
    Muss, HB
    Woolf, S
    Berry, D
    Cirrincione, C
    Weiss, RB
    Budman, D
    Wood, WC
    Henderson, IC
    Hudis, C
    Winer, E
    Cohen, H
    Wheeler, J
    Norton, L
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (09): : 1073 - 1081
  • [10] Early intensive and myeloablative adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk breast cancer
    Wörmann, B
    Meden, H
    Riggert, J
    Humpe, A
    Wulf, G
    Koch, B
    Köhler, M
    Kuhn, W
    Hiddemann, W
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1998, 18 (3C) : 2237 - 2241