Saccharin test: Methodological validation and systematic review of the literature

被引:3
|
作者
Caponnetto, Pasquale [1 ,2 ]
Emma, Rosalia [1 ,2 ]
Benfatto, Francesca [1 ]
Ferlito, Salvatore [3 ]
Gulino, Alessandro [3 ]
Maniaci, Antonino [3 ]
Lechien, Jerome R. [4 ]
Ingrassia, Angelo [3 ]
Cocuzza, Salvatore [3 ]
Polosa, Riccardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Teaching Hosp Policlin V Emanuele, Ctr Prevent & Treatment Tobacco Addict CPCT, Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Ctr Excellence Accelerat Harm Reduct CoEHAR, Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Dept Med Sci Surg Sci & Adv Technol GF Ingrassia, Via Santa Sofia 78, I-95124 Catania, Italy
[4] Univ Mons UMons, Fac Med, UMONS Res Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Human Anat & Expt Oncol, Mons, Belgium
关键词
mucociliary clearance; mucociliary clearance transit time; saccharin test; saccharin transit time test; reproducibility; tolerability; NASAL MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE; CILIARY BEAT FREQUENCY; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; DEFENSE-MECHANISM; SMOKERS; CESSATION; YOUNG;
D O I
10.1177/01455613211064044
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives Saccharin test (ST) is a convenient method to assess the efficiency of mucociliary clearance, the primary defense mechanism of the upper airways' tract. The study objectives are to: (1) substantiate its short- (3 days) and long-term (30 days) repeatability; (2) assess its tolerability; (3) conduct a systematic literature review and to compare our results with the existing evidence. Methods Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in an observational prospective study to perform an ST on three separate visits (at baseline; at follow-up visits at day 3 and at day 30). Transit times were recorded and self-reported nasal and general symptoms noted. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare our results with the existing literature. Results The mean values (+/- SD) of ST transit time (STTT) were 7.085 (+/- 2.19), 7.788 (+/- 2.11), and 7.790 (+/- 2.06) minutes at baseline, day 3, and day 30, respectively. Significant linear regression analysis was observed between day 3 and baseline (r = .193; P = .019) and day 30 and baseline (r = .182 P = .024). Significant agreement for the intrasession repeatability was observed with an ICC = .354 (P = .001). Outcomes' comparisons between baseline vs day 3 (P = .197) and baseline vs day 30 (P = .173) were not statistically significant. ST was well tolerated. Concordance with existing literature's data and high level of STTT repeatability were confirmed by the qualitative analysis. Conclusion STTT reproducibility was good both in the short- and long-term. ST tolerability was very good. Our study data are consistent with the existing literature, indicating ST as a sound methodology for detection of early respiratory health changes and for specific regulatory application in respiratory research.
引用
收藏
页码:NP494 / NP507
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review
    Medina-Lopez, Carmen
    Marin-Garcia, Juan A.
    Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela
    [J]. WPOM-WORKING PAPERS ON OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 (02): : 13 - 30
  • [2] Measuring greenwashing: A systematic methodological literature review
    Bernini, Francesca
    Giuliani, Marco
    La Rosa, Fabio
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2023,
  • [3] 'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
    Chiu, Kellia
    Grundy, Quinn
    Bero, Lisa
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (09)
  • [4] Yoga module development and validation: A systematic review with methodological guidelines
    Katla, Naresh
    Ramsahaye, Atmika
    Thulasi, Arun
    Ilavarasu, Judu
    Jagannathan, Aarti
    Bhargav, Hemant
    Varambally, Shivarama
    Gangadhar, Nanjudaiah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF YOGA, 2022, 15 (03) : 175 - 186
  • [5] The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners
    Mohamed Shaffril H.A.
    Samsuddin S.F.
    Abu Samah A.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2021, 55 (4) : 1319 - 1346
  • [6] Predicting corporate failure: a systematic literature review of methodological issues
    Appiah, Kingsley Opoku
    Chizema, Amon
    Arthur, Joseph
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 57 (05) : 461 - 485
  • [7] Crenobalneotherapy for limb osteoarthritis:: Systematic literature review and methodological analysis
    Forestier, Romain
    Francon, Alain
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2008, 75 (02) : 138 - 148
  • [8] Test process models: Systematic literature review
    Garcia, Cecilia
    Dávila, Abraham
    Pessoa, Marcelo
    [J]. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2014, 477 : 84 - 93
  • [9] Test Case Selection: A Systematic Literature Review
    Narciso, Everton Note
    Delamaro, Marcio Eduardo
    Dos Santos Nunes, Fatima De Lourdes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 24 (04) : 653 - 676
  • [10] Systematic literature review of validation methods for AI systems
    Myllyaho, Lalli
    Raatikainen, Mikko
    Mannisto, Tomi
    Mikkonen, Tommi
    Nurminen, Jukka K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2021, 181