Postponement of Motherhood in Slovakia in Cohort Perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Sprocha, Branislav [1 ]
Durcek, Pavol [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Spolocenskych & Psychologickych Vied SAV, Sancova 56, Bratislava 81105, Slovakia
[2] Univ Komenskeho Bratislave, Prirodovedecka Fak, Katedra Humannej Geog & Demog, Ilkovicova 6, Bratislava 84215, Slovakia
来源
SOCIOLOGIA | 2018年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
Cohort fertility; postponement; low fertility; Slovakia; education; FAMILY FORMATION; CHANGING FAMILY; EASTERN-EUROPE; HOUSING CENSUS; LOW-FERTILITY; TRANSITION; WOMEN; MARRIAGE; 1ST; COHABITATION;
D O I
10.31577/sociologia.2018.50.5.21
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Fertility postponement is one of the most important trends in the demographic behavior in Slovakia after collapse of previous political regime. The reproduction model which was primarily characterized by early motherhood began to diminish in late 1960s and with every new generation, it loses further ground. It is manifested in continuous rise in cohort mean age at first birth and a significant intergenerational drop in the cohort fertility rate. The benchmark analysis of cohort fertility has enabled us to analyze in detail the onset of the fertility postponement transition in Slovakia, as well as its dynamics and ultimate extent. We have also been able to identify the differences in the recuperation of the deferred births. Our analysis has confirmed that the earliest onset of fertility postponement can be found in Slovakia among women born in the first half of the 1970s. The formation of a new reproductive model in younger ages culminates in cohorts born in the 1980s. It also appears that the main cause of cohort fertility decline is caused by the low level of recuperation of second and higher births. The first order fertility is the most affected by the postponement process, but most of these deferred births are born in higher ages. Therefore the most important for the future development of fertility in Slovakia will be on how successful will women born in the 1970s and 1980s be in carrying out their deferred second pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 578
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE POSTPONEMENT AND RECUPERATION OF FERTILITY IN A COHORT PERSPECTIVE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND SLOVAKIA
    Sprocha, Branislav
    [J]. DEMOGRAFIE, 2014, 56 (03) : 219 - 233
  • [2] Motherhood postponement and regional differences in fertility in Czechia and Slovakia
    Sidlo, Ludek
    Sprocha, Branislav
    [J]. GEOGRAFIE, 2018, 123 (03): : 407 - 436
  • [3] Postponement of Motherhood in Romania: The Role of Educational Attainment
    Muresan, Cornelia
    [J]. REVISTA DE CERCETARE SI INTERVENTIE SOCIALA, 2014, 47 : 137 - 149
  • [4] The Postponement of Motherhood in Chile: Between Autonomy and Precarity
    Diaz, Martina Yopo
    [J]. UNIVERSUM-REVISTA DE HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2023, 38 (02): : 591 - 616
  • [5] Association between motherhood postponement and socioeconomic status
    Fuentes, Ariel
    Jesam, Cristian
    Devoto, Luigi
    Angarita, Blanca
    Galleguillos, Andrea
    Torres, Andrea
    Mackenna, Antonio
    [J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2010, 138 (10) : 1240 - 1245
  • [6] Early motherhood in an intergenerational perspective: The experiences of a British cohort
    Manlove, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1997, 59 (02): : 263 - 279
  • [7] A cohort perspective on the fertility postponement transition and low fertility in Central Europe
    Sprocha, Branislav
    Tisliar, Pavol
    Sidlo, Ludek
    [J]. MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS, 2018, 26 (02) : 109 - 120
  • [8] A Cohort Model of Fertility Postponement
    Goldstein, Joshua R.
    Cassidy, Thomas
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 2014, 51 (05) : 1797 - 1819
  • [9] Beyond the equation model of society - the postponement of motherhood in post-state socialism in an interdisciplinary life-course perspective
    Reiter, Herwig
    [J]. INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 22 (02) : 233 - 246
  • [10] Increasing Educational Disparities in the Timing of Motherhood in the Andean Region: A Cohort Perspective
    Ewa Batyra
    [J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 2020, 39 : 283 - 309