Risk prediction models for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and critical appraisal

被引:15
|
作者
Li, He [1 ]
Sun, Dianqin [1 ]
Cao, Maomao [1 ]
He, Siyi [1 ]
Zheng, Yadi [1 ]
Yu, Xinyang [1 ]
Wu, Zheng [1 ]
Lei, Lin [2 ]
Peng, Ji [2 ]
Li, Jiang [1 ]
Li, Ni [1 ]
Chen, Wanqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr, Off Canc Screening,Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Ctr Chron Dis Control, Dept Canc Prevent & Control, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2021年 / 10卷 / 20期
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
esophageal cancer screening; individualized risk assessment; prediction models; systematic review; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; ABSOLUTE RISK; ADENOCARCINOMA; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4226
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and aims Esophageal cancer risk prediction models allow for risk-stratified endoscopic screening. We aimed to assess the quality of these models developed in the general population. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases from January 2000 through May 2021 was performed. Studies that developed or validated a model of esophageal cancer in the general population were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias (ROB) assessment by the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) were performed independently by two reviewers. Results Of the 13 models included in the qualitative analysis, 8 were developed for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the other 5 were developed for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Only two models conducted external validation. In the ESCC models, cigarette smoking was included in each model, followed by age, sex, and alcohol consumption. For EAC models, cigarette smoking and body mass index were included in each model, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, uses of acid-suppressant medicine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug were exclusively included. The discriminative performance was reported in all studies, with C statistics ranging from 0.71 to 0.88, whereas only six models reported calibration. For ROB, all the models had a low risk in participant and outcome, but all models showed high risk in analysis, and 60% of models showed a high risk in predictors, which resulted in all models being classified as having overall high ROB. For model applicability, about 60% of these models had an overall low risk, with 30% of models of high risk and 10% of models of unclear risk, concerning the assessment of participants, predictors, and outcomes. Conclusions Most current risk prediction models of esophageal cancer have a high ROB. Prediction models need further improvement in their quality and applicability to benefit esophageal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:7265 / 7276
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Sun, Xuemei
    Chen, Yancong
    Gao, Yinyan
    Zhang, Zixuan
    Qin, Lang
    Song, Jinlu
    Wang, Huan
    Wu, Irene X. Y.
    [J]. AGING AND DISEASE, 2022, 13 (04): : 1215 - 1238
  • [2] Prediction Models for Prognosis of Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    He, Bingjie
    Chen, Weiye
    Liu, Lili
    Hou, Zheng
    Zhu, Haiyan
    Cheng, Haozhe
    Zhang, Yixi
    Zhan, Siyan
    Wang, Shengfeng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [3] Prediction models for depression risk among older adults: systematic review and critical appraisal
    Tan, Jie
    Ma, Chenxinan
    Zhu, Chonglin
    Wang, Yin
    Li, Han
    Li, Jiarun
    He, Yanxuan
    Wu, Chenkai
    [J]. AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2023, 83
  • [4] Prediction models for prognosis of influenza: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Sun, Yao
    Zhou, Yiwu
    Zhang, Shu
    [J]. SIGNA VITAE, 2021, 17 (05) : 18 - 29
  • [5] Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Qiu Lin
    Tong Yang
    Jin Yongmei
    Ye Mao Die
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [6] Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Qiu Lin
    Tong Yang
    Jin Yongmei
    Ye Mao Die
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [7] Prediction Models for the Development of COPD: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Zhou, Q. X.
    Shi, S. Y.
    Sun, F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [8] Prediction Models for Exacerbations of COPD: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
    Shuyuan, S.
    Qingxin, Z.
    Feng, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [9] Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Havsed, Kristian
    Petersson, Gunnel Hansel
    Isberg, Per-Erik
    Pigg, Maria
    Svensater, Gunnel
    Foresight Res Consortium
    Rohlin, Madeleine
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [10] Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal
    Kristian Havsed
    Gunnel Hänsel Petersson
    Per-Erik Isberg
    Maria Pigg
    Gunnel Svensäter
    Madeleine Rohlin
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 12