Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review

被引:23
|
作者
Thirsk, M. Lorraine [1 ,4 ]
Panchuk, T. Julia [1 ]
Stahlke, Sarah [2 ]
Hagtvedt, Reidar [3 ]
机构
[1] Athabasca Univ, Fac Hlth Disciplines, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Arts, Dept Sociol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Alberta Sch Business, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] 1 Univ Dr, Athabasca, AB T9S 3A3, Canada
关键词
Judgment and decision-making; Nursing; Clinical judgment; Cognitive bias; Implicit bias; Dual-process theory; Intuition; Scoping review; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; NURSING-CARE; PAIN; MODEL; ATTITUDES; TRIAGE; INTERVENTIONS; PROFESSIONALS; DEFINITION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104284
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive and implicit biases of healthcare providers can lead to adverse events in healthcare and have been identified as a patient safety concern. Most research on the impact of these systematic errors in judgment has been focused on diagnostic decision-making, primarily by physicians. As the largest component of the workforce, nurses make numerous decisions that affect patient outcomes; however, literature on nurses' clinical judgment often overlooks the potential impact of bias on these decisions. The aim of this study was to map the evidence and key concepts related to bias in nurses' judgment and decision-making, including interventions to correct or overcome these biases.Methods: We conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs methodology. In November 2020 we searched CINAHL, PsychInfo, and PubMed databases to identify relevant literature. Inclusion criteria were primary research about nurses' bias; evidence of a nursing decision or action; and English language. No date or geographic limitations were set.Results: We found 77 items that met the inclusion criteria. Over half of these items were published in the last 12 years. Most research focused on implicit biases related to racial/ethnic identity, obesity, and gender; other articles examined confirmation, attribution, anchoring, and hindsight biases. Some articles examined heuristics and were included if they described the process of, and the problems with, nurse decision-making. Only 5 studies tested interventions to overcome or correct biases. 61 of the studies relied on vignettes, surveys, or recall methods, rather than examining real-world nursing practice. This could be a serious oversight because contextual factors such as cognitive load, which have a significant impact on judgment and decision-making, are not necessarily captured with vignette or survey studies. Furthermore, survey and vignette studies make it difficult to quantify the impact of these biases in the healthcare system.Conclusions: Given the serious effects that bias has on nurses' clinical judgment, and thereby patient outcomes, a concerted, systematic effort to identify and test debiasing strategies in real-world nursing settings is needed. Tweetable abstract: Bias affects nurses' clinical judgment - we need to know how to fix it. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cognitive Biases in Cyber Decision-Making
    Lemay, Antoine
    Leblanc, Sylvain
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2018), 2018, : 395 - 401
  • [2] COGNITIVE BIASES IN DECISION-MAKING OF ENTREPRENEURS
    Zelienkova, Andrea
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 10TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: COMPETITION, 2018, : 426 - 433
  • [3] Goal programming and cognitive biases in decision-making
    Stewart, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (10) : 1166 - 1175
  • [4] Cognitive Biases in Humanitarian Sensemaking and Decision-Making
    Comes, Tina
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), 2016, : 56 - 62
  • [5] Propranolol, cognitive biases, and practical decision-making
    Craigie, Jillian
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (09): : 31 - 32
  • [6] Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review
    Acciarini, Chiara
    Brunetta, Federica
    Boccardelli, Paolo
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (03) : 638 - 652
  • [7] The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas
    Berthet, Vincent
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce the Effects of Cognitive Biases in the Decision-Making of Audiologists
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Featherston, Rebecca J.
    Downie, Laura E.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Hamilton, Bridget
    Granger, Catherine
    Shlonsky, Aron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 158 - 165
  • [9] Relationships between cognitive biases, decision-making, and delusions
    Sheffield, Julia M.
    Smith, Ryan
    Suthaharan, Praveen
    Leptourgos, Pantelis
    Corlett, Philip R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [10] Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making
    Dale F. Whelehan
    Kevin C. Conlon
    Paul F. Ridgway
    [J]. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2020, 189 : 1477 - 1484